November 2006 Puzzle Solutions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Solutions:

1. If a fraction f take the flu shot, then the death toll is 5f + 10(1-f)(1-f) = 5f + 10f2 - 20f + 10. That is, 10f2 - 15f + 10. This value is minimized when 20f = 15 or f = 0.75. At that point, we'd have a death toll of  only (5 * 0.75) + (2.5 * 0.25) = 4.375%. Notice however, that those who don't take the vaccine have a probability of only 2.5 percent of dying whereas the ones that do take the flu shot have a 5 percent chance of dying.

2. Exactly half (or maybe one less than half given the bias toward inaction). Here is why. Take the ith person. If half have already taken the flu shot, then there is no reason to take it. Person i will die with a 5 percent probability if he or she takes the shot and will die with  a 5 percent probability or less if he or she doesn't take the shot. If less than half have taken it and there are just enough people left for half to take it, then person i will take it for sure, because if he or she doesn't, the chances of living will be less than if he or she took the shot. We call this the "must vaccinate" point.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


3. The government wants f = 0.75 from the answer to 1. So if the initial perceived risk is R, each person will take then R(1-f) = R 0.25 = 5%. So R = 20%. That is, if everyone believes the initial unvaccinated risk is 20 percent, then 75 percent of the people will take the vaccine.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe