New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Now See This

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Who says science isn't fun? Visual illusions, such as the dozens you will find in this special issue, make great eye candy. But they also serve a serious purpose for researchers. How? Illusions push the mysterious and wondrous brain into revealing its secrets.

From the confusing and fragmentary inputs gathered by our senses, our brains create our seemingly fluid conscious perceptions and a sensible narrative of the world around us. Brains do not, however, talk to us about how they perform those impressive tasks. Scientists can learn a lot by using imaging equipment and by making other observations. But sometimes they also have to “trick” brains, the better to probe perception. That's where illusions come in.

“It is a fact of neuroscience that everything we experience is actually a figment of our imagination,” write Susana Martinez-Conde, director of the Laboratory of Visual Neuroscience at the Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix, and Stephen L. Macknik, director of the Laboratory of Behavioral Neurophysiology at Barrow, in “The Neuroscience of Illusion,” starting on page 4. “Although our sensations feel accurate and truthful, they do not necessarily reproduce the physical reality of the outside world.” Martinez-Conde and Macknik, whose articles fill this special edition, study these disconnects between reality and perception for clues about the brain's operations. On the following pages you will learn, among other things, about “impossible” figures, 3-D visualization and kinetic illusions in op art.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Want more? Martinez-Conde is president of the Neural Correlate Society, which runs the annual Best Illusion of the Year Contest, sponsored by the Mind Science Foundation and Scientific American. This year's event took place on May 10 at the Philharmonic Center for the Arts in Naples, Fla.; attendees select the winners. For full details and to see articles and illusions by past winners, go to http://illusioncontest.neuralcorrelate.com.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
SA Special Editions Vol 20 Issue 1sThis article was published with the title “Now See This” in SA Special Editions Vol. 20 No. 1s (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0510-1sp

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe