Nuclear Bomb Sensors Eavesdrop on Whales

A network of hydrophones intended to monitor nuclear tests may prove useful for conservation

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

An unlikely source is revealing some secretive habits of whales: the group tasked with monitoring nuclear weapons testing. The underwater hydrophone network of the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) was designed to listen for massive explosions, but its sonic sensors more often pick up the peaceful rumblings of the world's largest animals. Now scientists are exploiting this unique data set to estimate fin whale population sizes and movements, which could improve the species' uncertain conservation prospects.

In the past 20 years the CTBTO has installed 11 acoustic stations throughout the world, including six in the oceans. Each contains two sets of three hydrophones that receive signals and determine their origin. CTBTO observations helped to detect North Korea's 2017 nuclear tests and have yielded a treasure trove of scientific data.

These recordings are producing revelations about endangered fin whales, a species rebounding from hunting during the 20th century. Tarun Chandrayadula, an ocean engineer at the Indian Institute of Technology Madras, and his colleagues recently detected fin whales in CTBTO recordings off the southern tip of India—a region the species was not known to frequent. The finding, which Chandrayadula is working to publish, is helping boost his efforts to build a “whale atlas” detailing the annual movements of Indian Ocean cetaceans.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


CTBTO data can also help determine whales' population sizes—a prerequisite for effective conservation efforts. Danielle Harris, a marine biologist at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland, led a study published in May presenting a new method for estimating whale numbers using CTBTO's sparse hydrophone array. Harris calculates there is approximately one fin whale per 2,000 square kilometers near Wake Island, a coral atoll in the central Pacific Ocean.

“The first step is knowing how many animals you're trying to conserve,” says Sean Wiggins, a project scientist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, who was not involved in either Harris's or Chandrayadula's studies. But the CTBTO data have their limitations, Wiggins adds. The hydrophones detect sounds below 100 hertz, so they cannot sense the vocalizations of small whales or dolphins. Furthermore, the vast spaces between hydrophone stations make it difficult to pinpoint a whale's distance from a sensor—a problem Harris's new method attempts to resolve.

Still, CTBTO's 15-year record of global whale chatter is a boon for marine biologists, and the recordings can spark joy. “I thought it was the most fun thing,” Chandrayadula says, “just sitting at my desk and listening to these otherworldly creatures.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe