New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Oak Barrels May Sweeten Red Wine's Anti-Cancer Potential

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


With the holidays approaching, so too come opportunities to toast the season. New research provides additional incentive to do that with red wine. Scientists writing in the December 15 issue of the journal Angewandte Chemie International describe another component of red wine that could have anticancer activity.

The putative health benefits of red wine stem mainly from so-called polyphenol molecules that are known for their antioxidant activity. Stéphane Quideau of the European Institute of Chemistry and Biology in France and his colleagues analyzed an antitumor compound known as acutissimin A, which was first discovered in the bark of oak trees. The researchers found that ingredients of red wine possess two molecules that can potentially react to form acutissimin A. "The grape juice contains the flavonoid precursors catechin and epicatechin," Quideau explains. "During storage, the alcoholic liquid then extracts a whole bouquet of substances out of the oak barrels, including the necessary co-reactant, vescalagin." Indeed, when the team tested samples of red wine that had aged 18 months in oak barrels, they found two types of acutissimin compounds, A and B.

The potential benefits of acutissimin A arise from its ability to inhibit the enzyme DNA topoisomerase II, a target for cancer treatment. In in vitro studies, acutissimin A was 250 times more powerful than etoposide, a clinically used cancer drug. The researchers caution that red wine cannot be considered a cancer preventative. But the findings underscore the promise of polyphenols: Quideau notes that "a number of these substances have already made their way into medicine, but the potential has not been exhausted by a long shot."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe