Oak Barrels May Sweeten Red Wine's Anti-Cancer Potential

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


With the holidays approaching, so too come opportunities to toast the season. New research provides additional incentive to do that with red wine. Scientists writing in the December 15 issue of the journal Angewandte Chemie International describe another component of red wine that could have anticancer activity.

The putative health benefits of red wine stem mainly from so-called polyphenol molecules that are known for their antioxidant activity. Stéphane Quideau of the European Institute of Chemistry and Biology in France and his colleagues analyzed an antitumor compound known as acutissimin A, which was first discovered in the bark of oak trees. The researchers found that ingredients of red wine possess two molecules that can potentially react to form acutissimin A. "The grape juice contains the flavonoid precursors catechin and epicatechin," Quideau explains. "During storage, the alcoholic liquid then extracts a whole bouquet of substances out of the oak barrels, including the necessary co-reactant, vescalagin." Indeed, when the team tested samples of red wine that had aged 18 months in oak barrels, they found two types of acutissimin compounds, A and B.

The potential benefits of acutissimin A arise from its ability to inhibit the enzyme DNA topoisomerase II, a target for cancer treatment. In in vitro studies, acutissimin A was 250 times more powerful than etoposide, a clinically used cancer drug. The researchers caution that red wine cannot be considered a cancer preventative. But the findings underscore the promise of polyphenols: Quideau notes that "a number of these substances have already made their way into medicine, but the potential has not been exhausted by a long shot."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe