Obese Mice Can Move, but They Don't

Changes in brain chemistry blunt and restore movement

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

That New Year’s resolution to move more is one of the toughest to keep, and a group of scientists working with obese mice think they’re starting to understand why.

Rather than our sedentary lives causing weight gain, says Alexxai Kravitz, the National Institutes of Health neuroscientist who led the study, changes in brain chemistry after we start gaining weight blunt our capacity to move.

“Obese mice can move just fine,” says Kravitz, who published the work with his team on Thursday in Cell Metabolism.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


They just don’t.

What Kravitz and his crew found is that the activity of a particular dopamine receptor linked to movement goes down as mice gain weight on a high-fat diet. So the mice slow down and they move less. And when the researchers restored the activity of that dopamine receptor — DR2 — the mice started moving more, even though they were still obese.

The team also saw that lean mice missing the DR2 receptor acted like their obese buddies — they didn’t move around as much.

This is the therapeutic target, says Kravitz — restoring that dopamine receptor function.

“Maybe 20 or 30 years down the road, we could do that in people,” he says.

And one more thing: The scientists fed normal mice and the DR2-deficient mice the same high-fat diet. Both sets of mice gained weight at the same rate.

Kravitz says this is important because DR2 mutant mice move less from the get-go, whereas a normal mouse takes a little time to start seeing that dopamine receptor-related loss of exercise. The ability to exercise seems to be disconnected from weight gain, he says.

“Exercise is a healthy thing to do, but its impact on weight has been overstated,” he says. “We have to be realistic about the size of the effect of exercise on weight, as opposed to health benefits.”

Still, before you abandon your New Year’s exercise resolution, keep in mind that this study was done using a high-fat diet, and not the normal calorie restriction that people (try valiantly to) maintain when they diet. The fat in the high-fat diet could be what’s tamping down DR2, not the weight gain the mice see.

That’s a big drawback to the work, says Vicki Vieira-Potter, a University of Missouri physiologist not involved in the study.

“So they feed the mice this high-fat diet, it impairs the receptor, and that decreases activity. A high-fat diet is a nice way to induce obesity, but it’s not the same as obesity,” she says.

She also says that a lot of the weight gain in the mice came after they stopped moving around, which indicates that the loss of movement did impact obesity.

“To call inactivity a consequence and not a cause of obesity is a broad misreading of what their research shows,” she says.

Still, she is excited about this: A high-fat diet affects the body, but it also affects the brain, via dopamine signaling, and thus, it’s likely to affect behavior.

 

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on December 29, 2016

Leah Samuel is a staff reporter for STAT. A journalist for over 25 years, Leah's work has appeared in newspapers and magazines across the country, including Harvard Magazine, Labor Notes, The Chicago Reporter, and PublicSource.org. Leah is also a film fan, history buff, science nerd, and trivia nut. When she's not working on a story, she frequently replaces her notebook and pen with yarn and a crochet hook.

More by Leah Samuel

STAT delivers fast, deep, and tough-minded journalism. We take you inside science labs and hospitals, biotech boardrooms, and political backrooms. We dissect crucial discoveries. We examine controversies and puncture hype. We hold individuals and institutions accountable. We introduce you to the power brokers and personalities who are driving a revolution in human health. These are the stories that matter to us all.

More by STAT

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe