Ocean Parks Help Corals Rebound

Parrot fish help baby coral by clearing algae; the adult coral return the favor by creating nooks and crannies for parrot fish to hide in

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Exuma Cays Land and Sea Park in the Bahamas has existed since 1959 and been protected from fishing since 1986—but it took until now to prove that such fisheries management could actually help corals rebound.

One of the Caribbean's largest marine reserves at 171 square miles (442 square kilometers), the park has been studied as part of the Bahamas Biocomplexity Project—an effort to learn about the interaction of water, wildlife and human activity in this subtropical archipelago. As part of that project, researchers proved that grouper—a highly valuable commercial fish species—rebound in areas that are protected as marine reserves.

But "we wondered what was the net consequence of this big number of groupers inside the park," says Daniel Brumbaugh, senior conservation scientist at the Center for Biodiversity and Conservation at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. "They could suppress parrot fish populations, allow algae to bloom more and further its competition with coral."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In fact, the smaller species of parrot fish were experiencing such detrimental predation, according to a paper in the current Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. "Their sizes were smaller inside the park than outside," Brumbaugh says. "But the larger species of parrot fish actually were the same size inside and outside, but much more numerous within the park."

This allowed the more numerous variety of parrot fish to graze away the algae blooms and give the underlying coral reef an opportunity to regenerate. Video documentation of the seafloor proves that more baby coral established themselves inside the park—under the protection of the larger parrot fish grazing population—than outside. "They can't make it through this lawn of algae otherwise," Brumbaugh says. "They'll get smothered."

Although this finding does not apply to all marine reserves throughout the world—for example, coral reefs in the Pacific support a more complex food web—it is broadly true of any Caribbean marine reserve. And it may provide these reefs with the kind of resilience necessary to survive the host of threats that face them, from human fishing practices to climate change. "If we're going to have recovery of reefs in the Caribbean and elsewhere, we need baby corals to come back," Brumbaugh adds. "This is an approach that helps baby corals come back."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe