Of Mice and Asthma

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Asthma is very common among children living in inner-city areas, and it has been known for a while that allergens from cockroaches in their homes contribute to the disease. Two articles published in today¿s Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology address the question of whether mice, which often lead to allergies in people who are exposed to them at work, also play a role in asthma.

Robert A. Wood from Johns Hopkins University and his colleagues analyzed dust samples from 608 homes of children with asthma in inner-city areas of New York, Washington, D.C., Baltimore, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit and St. Louis. Ninety-five percent of them contained mouse allergen in at least one room, and the highest levels appeared in the kitchen, suggesting that mice had visited at some point.

Then the scientists tested 499 asthmatic children living in these homes for a variety of allergies, using a puncture skin test. About one fifth of them turned out to be sensitive to mice. Children who were prone to allergies in general were more often allergic to mice, especially if they were also exposed to high levels of mouse allergen at home. The children who were sensitive to mice, however, did not have more severe asthma than the children who were not. Thus, although mouse allergen is extremely widespread in inner-city homes, it does not seem to play the same role in asthma as cockroaches do.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe