New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Of Mice and Asthma

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Asthma is very common among children living in inner-city areas, and it has been known for a while that allergens from cockroaches in their homes contribute to the disease. Two articles published in today¿s Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology address the question of whether mice, which often lead to allergies in people who are exposed to them at work, also play a role in asthma.

Robert A. Wood from Johns Hopkins University and his colleagues analyzed dust samples from 608 homes of children with asthma in inner-city areas of New York, Washington, D.C., Baltimore, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit and St. Louis. Ninety-five percent of them contained mouse allergen in at least one room, and the highest levels appeared in the kitchen, suggesting that mice had visited at some point.

Then the scientists tested 499 asthmatic children living in these homes for a variety of allergies, using a puncture skin test. About one fifth of them turned out to be sensitive to mice. Children who were prone to allergies in general were more often allergic to mice, especially if they were also exposed to high levels of mouse allergen at home. The children who were sensitive to mice, however, did not have more severe asthma than the children who were not. Thus, although mouse allergen is extremely widespread in inner-city homes, it does not seem to play the same role in asthma as cockroaches do.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe