Oil- and Gas-Drilling Noise Stresses Birds

Animals that nest near the loud equipment show PTSD-like physiology and have more stunted offspring 

Ash-throated flycatcher.

Andrew Cannizzaro Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Constant noise—such as from the construction project next door or the car alarm that will not stop—can irritate anyone. And birds are no exception. A recent study found that sounds from oil- and gas-drilling operations contributed to chronic stress in three species of songbirds, mimicking what occurs in people with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Nathan Kleist, then a doctoral student at the University of Colorado Boulder, and his colleagues placed artificial nest boxes at various distances from gas-drilling pads in the San Juan Basin of New Mexico. Loud compressors there ran 24 hours a day.

Of the three species Kleist and his colleagues studied, mountain bluebirds and ash-throated flycatchers avoided nest boxes closest to compressors. Western bluebirds, in contrast, nested at sites along the full noise gradient. The researchers measured levels of the stress hormone corticosterone in adult females and nestlings of the three species at all the nest boxes over three years.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Credit: Amanda Montañez; Source: “Chronic Anthropogenic Noise Disrupts Glucocorticoid Signalting and Has Multiple Effects in an Avian Community,” by Nathan J. Kleist et al., in Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, Vol. 115, No. 4; January 23, 2018

The team found a linear relation between distance from the compressors and baseline corticosterone; birds nesting closest had lower stress hormone levels. This may seem counterintuitive, but hormone levels can increase or decrease depending on the type and timing of stress. A sustained change in either direction indicates chronic stress, and research on humans suffering from PTSD shows that their baseline levels typically decline.

The scientists also found that eggs in western bluebird nests closest to the compressors were less likely to hatch than eggs farther away. Nestling growth was stunted closer to compressors in all three species, the team reported in January in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. “With even modest increases in background noise, we could see these effects,” Kleist says. Nestlings farthest away experienced stunted growth as well (predators are more common at quieter sites, and heightened vigilance might reduce the birds' ability to feed their young). Nestlings at intermediate distances had the highest growth rates.

Michael Romero of Tufts University, who studies stress responses in wildlife and was not involved in the study, says, “The neat thing about this paper is that it showed environmental stress lowered [reproductive success].” Even wildlife in highly protected areas is not immune. “Most protected areas in the United States are experiencing increased background noise,” Kleist notes, making this “potentially a widespread issue.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe