Oil from BP Spill Slowing One of Ocean’s Fastest Fish

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Zachary Fagenson

MIAMI (Reuters) - A study by University of Miami scientists says mahi-mahi, a popular fish among restaurants and anglers and exposed as infants to oil from the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon spill, swim nearly half as fast as their unaffected counterparts.

"The worry is that if you have reduced swimming performance you’re going to be less effective at capturing prey, and less effective in avoiding (predators)," said Martin Grosell, a professor at the University of Miami’s Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers treated mahi-mahi embryos and young fish with oil collected from near the damaged wellhead and from the gulf’s surface. Individual fish were then transferred to clean water for at least 25 days before their swim speeds were tested in a kind of aquatic treadmill.

The speed of the young, inch-long fish, thought to be among the fastest on the planet at about five body lengths per second, "dropped by about 37 percent," Grosell said.

Assessing the extent of the damage on the population, however, is proving difficult as few statistics are kept on gulf mahi-mahi.

Scientists in 2000 failed in an attempt to count the number of brilliant, green-blue fish, also known as dolphinfish, living between Florida’s west coast and Texas, according to Steve Branstetter, a scientist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

“No management actions have ever been needed for this species,” the agency’s website said.

Grosell and scientists from across the country partnered with NOAA following the disaster to study the effect of the 87-day-long spill that dumped an estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

Researchers said they used oil concentrations similar to those measured in the gulf shortly after the spill, which oil company BP disputed on Friday.

“The study does not provide any evidence to show that an effect on that group of fish would have had a population-level impact,” BP spokesman Ryan Jason wrote in an e-mail.

In March, researchers from the University of Miami and Stanford University released test results showing oil caused heart deformations in young Bluefin tuna and a variety of other species, and may have led to low catch numbers in the years that followed the spill.

 

(Editing by David Adams; Editing by Grant McCool)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe