Forget It: Old Theory on Amnesia May Be Wrong

New study counteracts neurobiological dogma, which says inhibiting new protein formation in the brain causes memory loss

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Forty years of neurobiological research states that short-term memories are formed by modifying proteins, whereas long-term memories are shaped by new proteins. Thus, a class of drugs known to inhibit brain cells from manufacturing proteins are also known to prevent new memory formation, resulting in a form of amnesia.

A new study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA could turn this long-held notion on its ear, paving the way to new therapies for Alzheimer's and other diseases that cause dementia and memory loss. While researching the biochemical action triggered by the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin in the amygdala (involved in the formation of emotional memories), neuroscientists at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign noted a strange occurrence in the midbrain region. The levels of three neurotransmitters—norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonin—shot up 1,000 to 17,000 percent higher than their normal levels before abating to well below normal for eight to 48 hours.

"We know that anisomycin causes the large release of neurotransmitters," says senior study author Paul Gold, a professor in the university's Brain and Cognition Division. "Those neurotransmitters themselves regulate memory formation and that's the basis of the particular phenomenon."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Gold and his colleagues began their research on lab rats believing that neurotransmitter fluctuation modulated memory formation. To test their hypothesis, they placed the animals in a cage with one well-lit and one darkened compartment. During the training phase of the experiment, each time a rat ventured into the dark side, they would receive a shock to their feet. Forty-eight hours later, their memory was assessed by their hesitation to enter that compartment.

The team then injected anisomycin and propranolol, a drug that blocks norepinephrine receptors in the brain, into the amygdalae of rats. "We [essentially] blocked the biological consequences of the release of norepinephrine," Gold says, noting that it minimized the rats' memory loss, evidenced by their reluctance to enter the shock-inducing dark chamber. The amnesia caused by anisomycin was also less pronounced when they injected the rats with clenbuterol, a drug that causes norepinephrine release, when their neurotransmitter levels were low. Finally, when a high dose of norepinephrine was administered in lieu of anisomycin, before training, the excess neurotransmitter levels caused amnesia (just as the protein synthesis inhibitor had).

"Together," the study says, "these findings suggest that intra-amygdala injections of anisomycin interfere with memory formation by inducing extraordinary changes in the release profiles of [norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonin]." Gold adds that follow-up studies will help determine whether all protein synthesis inhibitors have the same effect on neurotransmitters and, also, whether these findings apply to other brain regions.

Yadin Dudai, a neurobiologist at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, notes that protein synthesis has been known to modulate neurotransmitter levels since the 1960s. He adds that the link between novel protein production and memory formation has been observed in several neural circuits in organisms ranging from mollusks to mammals. "I am not confident that the results of this interesting paper indeed demote a dogma," Dudai says. "However, I am supportive of any attempt to reverify the role of macromolecular synthesis observed immediately after the encoding of memory."

According to Gold, if the neurotransmitter fluctuation-based view does demote the dogma, there could be implications for researchers searching for drugs to counteract the effects of dementia that occur in diseases such as Alzheimer's. Researchers will have new targets—neurotransmitters rather than proteins—toward which to tailor their therapies.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe