Old Drugs Show New Promise in Combating Prion Diseases

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Two drugs that doctors have long used to treat malaria and certain psychotic illnesses may one day find a new use. According to findings reported today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the drugs effectively combat infectious prion proteins¿which can cause Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and other fatal, neurodegenerative orders¿in infected mouse cells.

A prion is a deformed, infectious version of the so-called cellular prion protein, which exists in healthy humans and many animals. The body is thought to regularly rid the brain's nerve cells of misfolded prion proteins. When that doesn't occur, however, the prion sets off a wave of destruction, converting normal proteins into the disease-causing form. In the new study, however, prion research pioneer Stanley B. Prusiner of the University of California at San Francisco and his colleagues found that the malaria drug quinacrine and chlorpromazine, which is approved to treat conditions like schizophrenia, actually inhibited the conversion of normal prion protein into the infectious kind. Indeed, more than three weeks after discontinuing treatment, the infected mouse cells remained free of prion infection.

Though quinacrine proved considerably more potent than chlorpromazine in the cell-based study, chlorpromazine's superior ability to cross the blood-brain barrier may ultimately make it more useful in treating people. Indications of that may come in an upcoming clinical trial, in which the researchers plan to test the two drugs separately and in combination. "It's a big leap from findings in cell culture to those in humans, and we do not know if we will see a favorable response in humans," team member Carsten Korth notes. "But the results we saw, in a cell model we consider valid, make this lead worth pursuing immediately."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe