On the Parasite's Trail

Scientists have traced malaria to its first human victims a mere 10,000 years ago

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


FOR MORE THAN A CENTURY researchers have been trying to figure out how malaria first arose in humans. The question is urgent, because more than two million people die every year from Plasmodium, the malaria parasite, and understanding its origins might one day lend clues to its complex biology. A piece of the puzzle fell into place in September 2009, when a team of researchers discovered that the main strain that infects human beings—P. falciparum—evolved from another version of the parasite, P. reichenowi, which currently infects chimpanzees. And it happened a mere 10,000 years ago—a moment in evolutionary terms.

The finding rests on a molecular comparison of the genomes of the two parasites. Stephen Rich, an evolutionary geneticist at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and his colleagues measured the diversity of the genomes, a rough proxy for age (genomes tend to acquire genetic components over time). Reichenowi's genome can be 20 times more diverse than falciparum's, which means reichenowi is much older. “It seems that malaria has been in chimps as long as they've been chimps,” Rich says.

Following the trail back to the origin of reichenowi is a more complicated problem, not least because malaria is so widespread. “In terrestrial vertebrates, we find it virtually everywhere we look,” Rich observes. “We're only getting started.”

Mike May is a freelance writer and editor based in Bradenton, Fla.

More by Mike May
Scientific American Magazine Vol 303 Issue 2This article was published with the title “On the Parasite's Trail” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 303 No. 2 (), p. 48
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0810-48c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe