On the Trail of Space Trash

The U.S. Air Force has a new plan to track tiny pieces of orbiting debris

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Since the space age began, the orbital realm has become increasingly littered with the detritus of skyward human striving—spent rocket boosters, dead satellites, stray pieces of hardware. Debris is piling up with such speed that it has become a threat to the kind of spacefaring endeavors that spawned it in the first place.

A September report by the National Research Council found that the debris field is so dense that collisions between objects in orbit will create additional debris faster than space junk falls out of orbit. The predicted outcome: an exponential growth of the number of pieces of space debris.

Already millions of pieces of refuse five millimeters and up circle Earth in a high-velocity swarm, each packing enough kinetic energy to disable a satellite. Far more sobering is the threat to human life. In June the six astronauts onboard the International Space Station took shelter in escape capsules when a piece of debris came within a few hundred meters of the station.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The U.S. is now taking preliminary steps to manage the threat of space junk by implementing better tracking systems. Space Fence, a new $6-billion radar system that the U.S. Air Force is planning, could dramatically increase the number of orbital objects under surveillance after it comes online around 2017.

As planned, Space Fence would comprise two radar stations in the Southern Hemisphere, which will take over for a 1960s-era radar system. Whereas the present system operates in the VHF band, Space Fence will use shorter-wavelength S-band radar, which affords better resolution for tracking debris. “The smaller the wavelength, the smaller the objects,” says Scott Spence, director of Raytheon’s Space Fence program. Raytheon and Lockheed Martin are vying for the government contract. The current debris catalogue goes down to roughly softball-size objects, but Space Fence, Spence says, may be able to track objects as small as a marble at lower altitudes.

Space Fence and other smaller-scale projects aim to increase what the military calls “space situational awareness.” How that awareness might progress to remedial action—the removal of orbital debris—remains unclear, though. 

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 305 Issue 5This article was published with the title “On the Trail of Space Trash” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 305 No. 5 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican112011-1uXNc0or8gO5DFns1cupVL

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe