New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

One Brainy Fish: Electric Fish from the Congo May Hold the Key to How We Move

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For decades neuroscientists have been building theories of brain function despite a near total lack of data on the most numerous neurons of all: cerebellar granule cells. Making up 70 billion of the nearly 86 billion neurons in the human brain, these relatively simple cells are tightly packed into the cerebellum, a broccoli-shaped structure tucked under the back of our brain. Cerebellar granule cells form part of a brain circuit with a strikingly regular, almost crystalline, structure.

Yet the purpose of this straightforward anatomical arrangement has baffled researchers. In the 1960s a team of neuroscientists, computer scientists and mathematicians theorized that these cells played an important role in the cerebellum’s ability to learn motor skills. Several groups of researchers set out to put the theory to the test, imagining that, shortly, our understanding of the brain would take a giant leap forward. But gathering data on granule cells turned out to be not so easy. Their dense packing, small size and location deep in the brain make them difficult to reach with traditional experimental techniques. The theory has gone unresolved for 40 years, casting a shadow over the efforts of cerebellum researchers. 

One possible road to discovery has recently come from an unusual source: the electric fish Gnathonemus petersii, which has long fascinated neuroscientists because it has a monstrously large cerebellum. By painstakingly recording the activity of individual granule cells with micro­elec­­t­rodes in a living electric fish, neuro­scientist Nate Sawtell of Columbia University’s Kavli Institute for Brain Science, where I am currently a Ph.D. candidate, has uncovered some of the first direct evidence in support of the 1960s theory that granule cells may enhance the cerebellum’s ability to learn skills such as fine movements. Sawtell showed that neurons receiving input from these cells were able to predict the position of the fish’s tail based on a combination of motor and sensory signals, a crucial step in the learning of motor skills. Sawtell is one of only a handful of neuroscientists working with this fish, but his results suggest the fish’s potential in helping to solve this long-standing mystery.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Knowing the function of cerebellar granule cells could lead to further important discoveries. In humans, the cerebellum’s extensive connectivity with the rest of the brain suggests it does far more than learn motor skills: it has been shown to have a part in both perception and cognition, with recent work linking cerebellar dysfunction to such complex diseases as schizophrenia and autism. It’s time to start listening to the silent majority of 70 billion, which we are now starting to do thanks to a little electric fish with a huge cerebellum.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 305 Issue 3This article was published with the title “One Brainy Fish: Electric Fish from the Congo May Hold the Key to How We Move” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 305 No. 3 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican092011-2pS8GKbXyVKE70SeQVBuWq

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe