One Brainy Fish: Electric Fish from the Congo May Hold the Key to How We Move

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For decades neuroscientists have been building theories of brain function despite a near total lack of data on the most numerous neurons of all: cerebellar granule cells. Making up 70 billion of the nearly 86 billion neurons in the human brain, these relatively simple cells are tightly packed into the cerebellum, a broccoli-shaped structure tucked under the back of our brain. Cerebellar granule cells form part of a brain circuit with a strikingly regular, almost crystalline, structure.

Yet the purpose of this straightforward anatomical arrangement has baffled researchers. In the 1960s a team of neuroscientists, computer scientists and mathematicians theorized that these cells played an important role in the cerebellum’s ability to learn motor skills. Several groups of researchers set out to put the theory to the test, imagining that, shortly, our understanding of the brain would take a giant leap forward. But gathering data on granule cells turned out to be not so easy. Their dense packing, small size and location deep in the brain make them difficult to reach with traditional experimental techniques. The theory has gone unresolved for 40 years, casting a shadow over the efforts of cerebellum researchers. 

One possible road to discovery has recently come from an unusual source: the electric fish Gnathonemus petersii, which has long fascinated neuroscientists because it has a monstrously large cerebellum. By painstakingly recording the activity of individual granule cells with micro­elec­­t­rodes in a living electric fish, neuro­scientist Nate Sawtell of Columbia University’s Kavli Institute for Brain Science, where I am currently a Ph.D. candidate, has uncovered some of the first direct evidence in support of the 1960s theory that granule cells may enhance the cerebellum’s ability to learn skills such as fine movements. Sawtell showed that neurons receiving input from these cells were able to predict the position of the fish’s tail based on a combination of motor and sensory signals, a crucial step in the learning of motor skills. Sawtell is one of only a handful of neuroscientists working with this fish, but his results suggest the fish’s potential in helping to solve this long-standing mystery.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Knowing the function of cerebellar granule cells could lead to further important discoveries. In humans, the cerebellum’s extensive connectivity with the rest of the brain suggests it does far more than learn motor skills: it has been shown to have a part in both perception and cognition, with recent work linking cerebellar dysfunction to such complex diseases as schizophrenia and autism. It’s time to start listening to the silent majority of 70 billion, which we are now starting to do thanks to a little electric fish with a huge cerebellum.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 305 Issue 3This article was published with the title “One Brainy Fish: Electric Fish from the Congo May Hold the Key to How We Move” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 305 No. 3 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican092011-2pS8GKbXyVKE70SeQVBuWq

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe