Only 10 Midges Needed to Make a Swarm

High-speed cameras reveal when these pesky insects become self-organizing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

To most people, a cloud of midges is an annoyance. To Nicholas Ouellette it is the key to a mysterious animal behavior — the swarm.

Ouellette, who works on complex systems at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, and his colleague James Puckett, have found that swarms of these insects become self-organizing when their numbers reach just ten individuals.

Their paper, published on 13 August in Journal of the Royal Society Interface, is part of a small but growing area of research producing data from real swarms to inform models of this behavior.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ouellette and Puckett set up laboratory colonies of Chironomus riparius midges, which live for only a few days after reaching adulthood and tend to fly only at dawn or dusk.

“A lot of people will say a swarm is just a whole bunch of insects,” says Ouellette. “I would like to say a swarm is somehow collective and self-organizing.”

The researchers used high-speed cameras to film the midges’ aerial activity and a computer program to reconstruct the flight paths of individual insects and to see when such collective behavior emerged.

Midge swarms do not show the choreographed movement of fish schools or bird flocks, but their members remain in just a small portion of the space available to them. There is, says Ouellette, “a very clear boundary that separates where the swarm is from where the rest of the world is”.

From analyzing the movements and locations of midges in 344 swarmings, the researchers determined that once a group of midges reached ten individuals, the statistics they were measuring — such as volume of space per individual midge and average distance between insects — became constant, marking the point that the individuals started behaving collectively.

“You don’t need a ton of individuals to see swarming. Once you get to about ten individuals the statistics don’t tend to change any more,” says Ouellette.

This creates a challenge for mathematicians who wish to create general models of swarming behavior. To be accurate, these models must be able to simulate animal aggregations without requiring a huge number of individuals.

Leah Edelstein-Keshet, a mathematician who studies swarming at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, says that the paper is “a very nice contribution to the field” and that the researchers are “pioneers, carefully tracking individuals flying in a three-dimensional swarm and sensibly using the data to examine how swarm size affects the collective behavior”.

“We need more such specific examples with careful tracking of individuals, she told Nature in an e-mail. “The agreement [between models and reality] is getting better all the time, because nowadays, folks are using the data to infer the behavior, not trying to retro-fit the data to old models.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on August 13, 2014.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe