New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Only 10 Midges Needed to Make a Swarm

High-speed cameras reveal when these pesky insects become self-organizing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

To most people, a cloud of midges is an annoyance. To Nicholas Ouellette it is the key to a mysterious animal behavior — the swarm.

Ouellette, who works on complex systems at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, and his colleague James Puckett, have found that swarms of these insects become self-organizing when their numbers reach just ten individuals.

Their paper, published on 13 August in Journal of the Royal Society Interface, is part of a small but growing area of research producing data from real swarms to inform models of this behavior.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ouellette and Puckett set up laboratory colonies of Chironomus riparius midges, which live for only a few days after reaching adulthood and tend to fly only at dawn or dusk.

“A lot of people will say a swarm is just a whole bunch of insects,” says Ouellette. “I would like to say a swarm is somehow collective and self-organizing.”

The researchers used high-speed cameras to film the midges’ aerial activity and a computer program to reconstruct the flight paths of individual insects and to see when such collective behavior emerged.

Midge swarms do not show the choreographed movement of fish schools or bird flocks, but their members remain in just a small portion of the space available to them. There is, says Ouellette, “a very clear boundary that separates where the swarm is from where the rest of the world is”.

From analyzing the movements and locations of midges in 344 swarmings, the researchers determined that once a group of midges reached ten individuals, the statistics they were measuring — such as volume of space per individual midge and average distance between insects — became constant, marking the point that the individuals started behaving collectively.

“You don’t need a ton of individuals to see swarming. Once you get to about ten individuals the statistics don’t tend to change any more,” says Ouellette.

This creates a challenge for mathematicians who wish to create general models of swarming behavior. To be accurate, these models must be able to simulate animal aggregations without requiring a huge number of individuals.

Leah Edelstein-Keshet, a mathematician who studies swarming at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, says that the paper is “a very nice contribution to the field” and that the researchers are “pioneers, carefully tracking individuals flying in a three-dimensional swarm and sensibly using the data to examine how swarm size affects the collective behavior”.

“We need more such specific examples with careful tracking of individuals, she told Nature in an e-mail. “The agreement [between models and reality] is getting better all the time, because nowadays, folks are using the data to infer the behavior, not trying to retro-fit the data to old models.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on August 13, 2014.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe