New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Optics Research Garners Nobel in Physics

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This year¿s Nobel Prize in physics is split between three scientists in the field of optics. They are Roy Glauber of Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass., John Hall of the University of Colorado and National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, Colo., and Theodor H¿nsch of the Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich and the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics in Garching, Germany. Glauber received the award for his theoretical description of the behavior of light particles; Hall and H¿nsch used that theory to develop a precision laser than can measure the color of the light of atoms and molecules, which can help identify the composition of materials.

Light is ubiquitous and is something many people take for granted. But it has the paradoxical quality of behaving in two forms--as waves and as streams of particles known as photons--which can make harnessing it for technological purposes a challenge. Until the development of lasers, scientists relied on 19th-century theories to describe how excited atoms and molecules emit photons of light. But the descriptions were inadequate and could not explain, for example, the fundamental differences between light radiating from a lightbulb (which contains a mixture of light wave frequencies and phases) and light beaming from a laser (which has a specific frequency and phase).

In 1963 Glauber published two breakthrough papers on the topic. He showed how conventional theories were inadequate and used the emerging field of quantum optics to reveal the difference between lightbulbs and lasers. Decades later, Hall and H¿nsch, working separately, used Glauber's theories to build a high-precision device called an optical frequency comb, which can measure the color emitted or absorbed by atoms and molecules. Cosmologists use the technology to determine the strength of the interaction between light and matter. Changes in this so-called "fine-structure constant" could redefine the latter. And although that might not seem like much, recognizing such changes could help improve navigation signals in communication technologies that are becoming as pervasive as light itself.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe