Optics Research Garners Nobel in Physics

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This year¿s Nobel Prize in physics is split between three scientists in the field of optics. They are Roy Glauber of Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass., John Hall of the University of Colorado and National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, Colo., and Theodor H¿nsch of the Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich and the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics in Garching, Germany. Glauber received the award for his theoretical description of the behavior of light particles; Hall and H¿nsch used that theory to develop a precision laser than can measure the color of the light of atoms and molecules, which can help identify the composition of materials.

Light is ubiquitous and is something many people take for granted. But it has the paradoxical quality of behaving in two forms--as waves and as streams of particles known as photons--which can make harnessing it for technological purposes a challenge. Until the development of lasers, scientists relied on 19th-century theories to describe how excited atoms and molecules emit photons of light. But the descriptions were inadequate and could not explain, for example, the fundamental differences between light radiating from a lightbulb (which contains a mixture of light wave frequencies and phases) and light beaming from a laser (which has a specific frequency and phase).

In 1963 Glauber published two breakthrough papers on the topic. He showed how conventional theories were inadequate and used the emerging field of quantum optics to reveal the difference between lightbulbs and lasers. Decades later, Hall and H¿nsch, working separately, used Glauber's theories to build a high-precision device called an optical frequency comb, which can measure the color emitted or absorbed by atoms and molecules. Cosmologists use the technology to determine the strength of the interaction between light and matter. Changes in this so-called "fine-structure constant" could redefine the latter. And although that might not seem like much, recognizing such changes could help improve navigation signals in communication technologies that are becoming as pervasive as light itself.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe