Optimism Is a Double-Edged Sword in Relationships

General positivity is good but unrealistic expectations about love lead to problems

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Seeing the world through rose-colored glasses is linked with greater satisfaction with one's relationship. Seeing your relationship through those same lenses, on the other hand, can actually lead to less satisfaction, according to a longitudinal study of 61 newlywed couples reported in the July 2013 issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

The study found that for spouses higher in dispositional optimism, a stable personality trait, marital well-being declined less during the first year of marriage. They also took a more positive approach to resolving conflicts, such as trying to define a common goal and brainstorm ways to work toward it. Spouses higher in relationship-specific optimism, however, had greater declines in marital well-being and displayed more negative problem-solving behaviors, such as avoiding tough discussions or trying to suppress their own desires.

The researchers theorize that having unrealistically high expectations of one's relationship can lead to disappointment when even minor conflicts arise and make spouses less likely to respond proactively to difficulties. Study co-author Lisa Neff, a psychologist at the University of Texas at Austin, cautions this finding does not mean pessimism is the way to go. “In my study, no one scored low enough to be considered pessimistic, and I would not expect that to be good for relationships,” she says. “It is great to be optimistic, but keep it at a more realistic level.”

Tori Rodriguez is a journalist and psychotherapist based in Atlanta. Her writing has also appeared in the Atlantic, Women's Health and Real Simple.

More by Tori Rodriguez
SA Mind Vol 25 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Dangerous Expectations” in SA Mind Vol. 25 No. 1 (), p. 9
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0114-9

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe