Oral Drug Halts Smallpoxlike Virus in Mice

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Amidst elevated concerns about the possibility of a biological attack involving smallpox after the terrorist events of last fall, the search for drugs to combat the dread infection has intensified. To that end, findings announced today at the 15th International Conference on Antiviral Research in Prague may represent an important advance. Researchers reported that an oral drug known as hexadecyloxypropyl-cidofovir (HDP-CDV) stymies smallpox and its kin in tissue culture and in mice.

Routine smallpox vaccination ended in 1972, and the variola virus that causes smallpox was declared eradicated several years later. Laboratories in the U.S and in Russia hold the last official samples of the virus, but experts have feared for some time that terrorists may have samples of their own. Although the U.S. has a supply of the vaccine remaining, serious adverse reactions to it can occur. Researchers have thus been searching for alternatives.

The new drug appears especially promising. In addition to blocking the replication of several strains of smallpox in tissue culture, HDP-CDV also effectively combated the closely related cowpox virus in mice. A derivative of the compound cidofovir (which has been shown to be effective against smallpox in animals), HDP-CDV is both more potent and more easily administered than its predecessor, report Karl Y. Hostetler of the University of California, San Diego, and colleagues. "[Cidofovir] can only be given intravenously," Hostetler explains. "If you've got thousands of people exposed to smallpox, a drug that needs to be injected would be difficult to use widely." HDP-CDV, in contrast, could potentially be given in pill form over a period of five to 14 days for the prevention and treatment of smallpox.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Until now, the eradication and control of smallpox relied upon vaccination," Hostetler observes. But the new results "suggest that antiviral drugs given orally in a regimen consisting of as few as five doses might be used an alternative to treat and contain a future outbreak of smallpox, especially in those individuals who cannot safely be vaccinated." Additional testing of HDP-CDV in animals will be required before human trials can begin, however.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe