New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Organic Chemists Receive Nobel

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Organic chemists Yves Chauvin, Robert Grubbs, and Richard Schrock have won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their groundbreaking research on a reaction called metathesis, which breaks the bonds of carbon-based molecules so that they can be combined with other elements including hydrogen, oxygen and chlorine to form new molecules. Not only has the process resulted in new compounds used to make everything from living tissue to plastics to therapeutic drugs for treating Alzheimer's disease, arthritis and HIV/AIDS, but it also produces fewer environmentally hazardous byproducts than previous methods did.

Organic chemistry is based on the multitalented carbon molecule, which has the ability to break apart and bind with a host of other elements. The process that makes it happen, called metathesis, was first reported in the 1950s and slowly gained notoriety as more and more chemists began to realize its potential. But metathesis requires a catalyst that can break apart specific molecular bonds while leaving other connections intact and involves many steps that produce wasteful by-products.

In 1971 Chauvin, now honorary director of research at the French Institute for Petroleum, outlined for the first time a streamlined recipe for how metal compounds could serve as those catalysts. It was Schrock and Grubbs who came up with the actual ingredients. After many attempts with various compounds, Schrock, a chemistry professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, reported in 1990 that molybdenum was an effective catalyst. The breakthrough opened the floodgates on metathesis as an important process in synthetic chemistry. Unfortunately, molybdenum was sensitive to oxygen and moisture, which reduced its efficacy. Two years later, Grubbs, a chemistry professor at the California Institute for Technology, improved upon the work. He found that ruthenium could not only serve as a successful catalyst, but it was stable enough to initiate metathesis in the presence of air, alcohol or water. The finding was so significant that it is now held as the standard by which new catalysts are measured.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In a relatively short amount of time, the work of these three scientists has launched the development of new compounds that affect the lives of millions of people each day.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe