New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Organic Ink Helps Scientists 'Write' Tiny Fluid Factories

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers have developed a new method of "writing" tiny mazes of pipes in millimeter-size devices. Using special ink, they have successfully manufactured three-dimensional networks of channels that can be used to mix microscopic streams of fluid. The findings, published online today by the journal Nature Materials, could aid in the development of new biosensors or improved "labs-on-chips."

Most current biochips rely on conventional lithography techniques to construct channels through which liquid can flow on a chip's surface. Although it's possible to position a few layers on top of one another to approximate three dimensions, this procedure is time-consuming because it requires a separate mask or stamp for each layer. Now Jennifer A. Lewis and her colleagues at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign have demonstrated an easy and quick approach to manufacture true three-dimensional arrays of microchannels. The procedure, Lewis says, "opens up new avenues for device design that are currently inaccessible by conventional methods."

To make their 3-D network of cylindrical channels, the researchers employed a robotic apparatus that squeezed out trails of organic ink from a syringe, in much the same way as a cake decorator lays down tracks of icing. The platform was then rotated 90 degrees before each additional trail was applied, resulting in a scaffold made of 16 layers of ink. The team next applied a resin around the scaffold. Once it had hardened, the material was heated and the ink, which liquefied, was removed. Finally, the scientists applied a second resin that can be cured by ultraviolet (UV) light. By monitoring which sections of the network were exposed to UV light, they controlled which channels remained open and which were closed off. The researchers tested the channels' mixing efficiency by monitoring the progress of two different colored dye streams through the towers they had created. "Due to their complex architecture, these three-dimensional towers dramatically improve fluid mixing compared to simple one- and two-dimensional channels," study co-author Scott White comments. Indeed, these three-dimensional networks (see image, above) can accomplish the same amount of mixing as their two-dimensional counterparts in much less space. Notes Lewis, "Full-fledged 'factories-on-a-chip' for any of the long-term applications envisioned may require these more complex structures."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe