Organisms in Algae-Rich Lakes May Absorb Less Mercury

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Recently, the Food and Drug Administration decided to revisit its recommendations regarding fish consumption for pregnant women because of mercury's harmful effects on developing fetuses. It seems that determining advisories is as complicated as understanding the metal's path through the environment. Now scientists have elucidated one element of its distribution. According to a study published online today by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the amount of algae present in a lake may affect how much mercury makes its way up the local food chain. The findings could clarify why concentrations of the element in the water don't always indicate corresponding levels in fish.

Paul C. Pickhardt of Dartmouth College and colleagues set-up and monitored a dozen 450-liter tanks containing varying levels of nutrients and algae as well as precise amounts of traceable mercury and methylmecury (the form that bioaccumulates in fish). They found that the algae incorporated mercury within 24 hours. The researchers next added zooplankton that feeds on algae to the tanks and measured their uptake of mercury. Zooplankton in tanks with low levels of algae, they found, had methylmercury levels two to three times those found in zooplankton from tanks containing higher levels of algal biomass. According to the report, in systems with less algae, each individual cell has a higher concentration of the compound and the zooplankton (which fish feed on) eat more mercury with each meal. "These results tell us that over the season in a lake, changes that cause the algae to increase or decrease can also quickly produce changes in the amount of mercury that moves through the ecosystem," study co-author Carol Folt says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The authors caution that their data contain "a substantial amount of unexplained variation." To better understand differences why fish in similar lakes can have differing levels of mercury, the team plans to study four bodies of water that contain both high and low levels of algae. Discerning the mechanism of mercury distribution is important, Folt comments, because "right now, scientists and government officials are trying to figure out how and when to measure mercury in order to issue more precise advisories about human consumption of fish."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe