New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Orphaned Chimpanzees Play Rougher Than Their Mother-Reared Counterparts

Chimps need parental guidance to safely horse around

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In central Zambia, at the Chimfunshi Wildlife Orphanage, dozens of parentless chimpanzees are raised among their peers, without adults. The arrangement is a lucky one for the chimps: in the wild, orphanhood can mean death.

Yet the parentless life—even at a refuge—has its drawbacks. Across a wide range of social species, research has demonstrated how normal social development depends on the presence of mature individuals, which leaves orphans at a disadvantage.

To find out how maternal rearing shapes chimp interactions, researchers watched two populations of Chimfunshi juveniles at play: one group of orphans and one of chimps that were raised by their mothers. Surprisingly, the orphans initiated play more often than the mother-reared group. “I was relieved to find that the orphans were very motivated to try and engage in playful interactions because these are commonly seen as a sign of psychological health,” says graduate student Edwin van Leeuwen, who led the research at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in Nijmegen, the Netherlands.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although the orphaned chimps liked to play, they were not always good at it. Most of their bouts lasted less than 60 seconds, whereas the mother-reared chimpanzees were more likely to play for a few minutes at a time. Furthermore, the orphans' behavior was more than five times as likely to escalate into aggression, according to the study, published in Animal Cognition.

What keeps the mother-reared chimps' play from turning ugly? It could be that they have learned to use subtle signals that maintain a relaxed atmosphere. Many play behaviors, such as gnawing and hitting, are easily mistaken for aggression, and growing up around adults may allow youngsters to learn the rules of friendly engagement.

Or perhaps a mother's strict oversight from early on sets lasting boundaries. If mothers consistently step in when play gets out of hand, “then over time, the mother-reared ones will have learned not to escalate,” says Claudio Tennie, an ape researcher at the University of Birmingham in England.

The good news for orphaned juveniles is that they still have time to learn social norms. “Orphans can grow up to become relatively socially competent,” van Leeuwen says, “as long as they have a chance to live their lives freely in a large and appropriate environment with many others.” He adds that Chimfunshi has four such groups with grown-up orphans and that overall “they seem to be healthy and stable and exhibit typical chimpanzee behavior.”

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Play Nice” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 6 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1213-21

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe