New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Our Galaxy's Next Supernova?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astronomers have identified the best candidate yet for our galaxy's next supernova explosion, according to a new report. Findings published in the February 1 issue of the Astrophysical Journal suggest that Rho Cassiopeiae, located 10,000 light-years away from earth, is most likely to run out of fuel and meet a violent fate in the near future.

An international team of astronomers studied the star between 1993 and 2002 using the William Herschel Telescope. Nothing seemed out of the ordinary for the first seven years as Rho Cassiopeiae, one of only seven known yellow hypergiant stars in our galaxy, underwent periodic temperature fluctuations of a few hundred degrees. But during the summer of 2000, the star's temperature plummeted from 7,000 to 4,000 Kelvins over the course of just a few months. During this time, the astronomers also detected titanium oxide in the star's atmosphere. The scientists posit that the compound was part of a shell, which became detached from the star by a shock wave. The amount of ejected material--equal to 10,000 times the mass of the earth--was the largest ever observed in a single stellar eruption.

"Rho Cassiopeiae could end up in a supernova explosion at any time as it has almost consumed the nuclear fuel at its core," says team member Garik Israelian of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias. "The monitoring of this and other unstable evolved stars may help us to shed some light on the very complicated evolutionary episodes that precede supernova explosions."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe