Our Galaxy's Next Supernova?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astronomers have identified the best candidate yet for our galaxy's next supernova explosion, according to a new report. Findings published in the February 1 issue of the Astrophysical Journal suggest that Rho Cassiopeiae, located 10,000 light-years away from earth, is most likely to run out of fuel and meet a violent fate in the near future.

An international team of astronomers studied the star between 1993 and 2002 using the William Herschel Telescope. Nothing seemed out of the ordinary for the first seven years as Rho Cassiopeiae, one of only seven known yellow hypergiant stars in our galaxy, underwent periodic temperature fluctuations of a few hundred degrees. But during the summer of 2000, the star's temperature plummeted from 7,000 to 4,000 Kelvins over the course of just a few months. During this time, the astronomers also detected titanium oxide in the star's atmosphere. The scientists posit that the compound was part of a shell, which became detached from the star by a shock wave. The amount of ejected material--equal to 10,000 times the mass of the earth--was the largest ever observed in a single stellar eruption.

"Rho Cassiopeiae could end up in a supernova explosion at any time as it has almost consumed the nuclear fuel at its core," says team member Garik Israelian of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias. "The monitoring of this and other unstable evolved stars may help us to shed some light on the very complicated evolutionary episodes that precede supernova explosions."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe