New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Over 20 Years of Climate Talks: Interactive Timeline

What was accomplished—or not—during two decades of United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change summits

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What's it take to make an international climate accord? Sift heaping handfuls of patience. Whip the voices of opposition until stiff peaks form. Let rise for two weeks every year in a cavernous convention center someplace; it should smell warm, sweaty and stale by the end. Add a dash—not much!—of progress. 

Almost 25 years ago United Nations delegates started cooking an international treaty to stabilize greenhouse gas emissions at a level that avoids dangerous climate change. 

They began with a framework—the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or UNFCCC—that set no mandatory limits, carried no enforcement provisions and is non-binding. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Future updates, called "protocols," would set mandatory limits. The only one so far is the Kyoto Protocol, which became better known than the UNFCCC itself. Its first phase expired in 2012; a second expires in 2020. 

Now the kitchen is primed for the next agreement, which maps cuts and financing required for 2020 and beyond. It might emerge in Paris in December. 

Here's how we got there. Just don't forget to heat the oven from 350 ppm to 400:

This article originally appeared at The Daily Climate, the climate change news source published by Environmental Health Sciences, a nonprofit media company.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe