Overworked "Scrubs" Are More Likely to Make Mistakes that Harm or Kill Their Patients

A new study shows that sleep-deprived interns are prone to err--sometimes fatally

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The marathon working shifts expected of first-year medical residents, called interns, are putting patients in danger, according to the first study to identify mistakes that injured patients. After five 24-hour-plus shifts a month, the study found that interns were seven times more likely to harm a patient through error than if they had not worked any long shifts, and four times more likely to make a mistake that resulted in a patient's death.

"These data suggest that fatigue contributes to tens of thousands of injuries to patients and thousands of deaths" annually, says Charles Czeisler of Harvard Medical School, who led the study. "Academic medicine is failing both doctors and patients."

The new findings are based on responses from 2,737 interns nationwide who voluntarily submitted monthly reports on their work hours and fatigue-related errors. The questionnaires, crafted by Czeisler and his colleagues, asked interns if they had made any harmful or fatal errors that they felt were the result of fatigue or sleep deprivation as well as if they had erred due to other causes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Based on a total of 17,003 reports, the researchers found that working even a few prolonged shifts led to significantly more errors. After one to four extended shifts, interns were 3.5 times more likely to report that they had made a fatal error and were 8.7 times more likely to report they had inadvertently harmed a patient. Marathon shifts also made the interns more likely to doze off during surgery, lectures and while examining patients alone or with other doctors, the monthly reports showed.

More stringent guidelines adopted three years ago still allow residents to work up to nine 30-hour shifts per month, but earlier this year Czeisler's gropu found that interns routinely violated many of the new guidelines.

In absolute terms, 1 to 2 percent of the monthly reports included a harmful error, and 0.3 to 0.4 percent included a fatal error. Czeisler based his estimate of mistake-related deaths on the number of interns (at least 100,000) now practicing in the U.S. and the assumption that more experienced residents are erring at similar rates.

The study "exposes interns' extended shifts as a weakness in the design of the residency system," writes public health researcher Mariana Szklo-Coxe of the University of Wisconsin in an editorial that accompanies the new study, which was published online this week by PLoS Medicine.

To reduce medical errors, she recommends that hospitals or health officials require residents to take naps and work only 14-hour shifts, which studies have found to reduce errors and are closer to the limits imposed in European countries.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe