New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Pacemaker Powered by Heartbeats Has Watch Parts

An automatic wristwatch mechanism harnesses heartbeats

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Electronic pacemakers time the heartbeats of more than three million people in the U.S. For these patients, surgery is a regular occurrence. A pacemaker's batteries must be swapped out every five to eight years, and the electric leads that connect the device to the heart can wear out, too.

In an effort to eliminate the batteries and leads altogether, biomedical engineers at the University of Bern in Switzerland have built a heartbeat-powered pacemaker, assembled from self-winding clockwork technology that is more than two centuries old.

Automatic wristwatches, invented in 1777, contain a weighted rotor that turns when a wearer's wrist moves. The rotor winds up a spring, and when the fully coiled spring unwinds, it turns the watch's gears. In modern versions, the gears drive a tiny current-producing generator.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Like the jostling of a wrist, a beating heart can also wind a spring, the Swiss team found. The researchers stripped an automatic wristwatch of its time-indicating parts, enclosed the winding mechanism in a three-centimeter-wide case and sutured it to a live pig's heart. The prototype produced 50 microwatts of power; pacemakers need about 10.

The device currently has a “messy setup,” says Adrian Zurbuchen, who presented details about it at the European Society of Cardiology Congress late last summer. Wires connect the watch parts to a box containing electronics and a pacemaker. The goal is to have everything in one device. It will not be ready for prime time soon, predicts Spencer Rosero, who is director of the pacemaker clinic at the University of Rochester Medical Center and was not involved in the project. He says if tests are successful, medicine will most likely first see a pacemaker with both a battery and energy-harvesting components.

Prachi Patel is a freelance journalist based in Pittsburgh. She writes about energy, materials science, nanotechnology, biotechnology and computing.

More by Prachi Patel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 1This article was published with the title “The Pulse of Pacemakers” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 1 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0115-14

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe