New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Pacemakers That Temporarily Disrupt the Heart's Rhythm May Boost Its Health

Counterintuitively, key heart health indicators proved markedly better in dogs with pacemakers programmed for a period of irregular contractions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sometimes it pays to be out of sync. A new study shows that intentionally throwing off the timing of a heart's contractions can effectively treat a failure to pump sufficient blood.

In about a quarter of the five million Americans with the condition known as heart failure, the organ's chambers fail to contract in perfect synchrony. When pacemakers are implanted to restore favorable timing—known as cardiac resynchronization therapy—the heart often ends up stronger than in heart failure patients who never had out-of-step contractions. In essence, moving from dyssynchrony to synchrony seems to be beneficial. That observation led David Kass, who directs the Johns Hopkins Center for Molecular Cardiobiology, to a tantalizing question: Could heart failure patients with regular contractions benefit from a little discord?

To answer the question, Kass and his colleagues placed pacemakers into 23 dogs, 17 of which were induced into heart failure. Then, for six hours a day, the pacemaker in eight of the experimental animals forced the right side of the ventricle to contract earlier than the left side. For the rest of each day, the device reverted to synchronized pacing.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After four weeks, key indicators of heart health proved markedly better in the dogs with pacemakers programmed for a period of irregular contractions. Their hearts pumped blood more forcefully, and proteins responsible for contractions and muscle structure were more abundant. The results, published last December in Science Translational Medicine, “fly in the face of our conventional thoughts about cardiac resynchronization therapy,” says George Thomas, a cardiologist at NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College who was not involved with the study.

The treatment can be likened to the body's reaction following a vaccination. Just as an injection of a weakened or partial virus triggers a protective immune response, exposing the heart to a “dose” of dyssynchrony fortifies its functioning. Kass plans to study the approach in humans in a year or so, but other cardiologists have already taken notice of the preliminary results. “It's a very thought-provoking, original idea,” says David Frankel, who treats heart failure at the University of Pennsylvania. He thinks many patients could benefit from a break in the monotony.

Related: What Does It Mean When Your Heart Skips a Beat?

Jessica Wapner is a science journalist. She is author of Wall Disease (2020) and The Philadelphia Chromosome (2014), both published by The Experiment. Wapner lives in upstate New York.

More by Jessica Wapner
Scientific American Magazine Vol 314 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Off the Beaten Path” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 314 No. 3 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0316-16a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe