New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Off-Label Use: Pain Medication and Antipsychotics May Stop Brain Tumor Growth

Several drugs, some used clinically today, have been found to be effective in regulating the growth of neural stem cells, including cancer cells

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

After screening nearly 1,300 chemical compounds, scientists have identified a number of drugs in use today that may in stop the growth of neural stem cells, including cancerous populations. The finding, reported in this week's issue of Nature Chemical Biology, opens up the possibility of using drugs already available to battle brain tumors, which kill an estimated 13,000 people in the U.S. yearly.

"A lot of the receptors for those drugs were thought to be exclusively expressed in mature cells in the central nervous system," says study co-author Peter Dirks, a neurosurgeon and researcher at The Hospital for Sick Children's Brain Tumor Research Center in Toronto, "They may have the same function on stem cells as they do on the mature cells," which makes them candidates for treating brain cancer. Dirks and his team found 160 compounds that interfered with the development and proliferation of neurospheres—clusters of cells in different stages of differentiation, ranging from stem cells to cells well on their way to becoming neurons or glia (cells that support and insulate neurons). The researchers then tested the drugs both in vitro, with cells derived from an embryonic mouse brain, human brain tumor cells and with cancer cells from knockout mice, which were genetically predisposed to develop brain tumors.

Several of the prescreened drugs seemed to inhibit tumor growth in the human and mouse cancer cells as well as in the knockout mice. "Some of the drugs were quite selective for the human cancer cells versus the normal human cells," Dirks says, "suggesting there may be some window of therapeutic opportunity." The drugs are already being used to treat other disorders.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Among them: butaclamol is used to inhibit receptors for dopamine (a neurotransmitter active in the brain's reward and pleasure systems) and as an antipsychotic for schizophrenics. Ifenprodil acts on the amino acid NMDA, the receptors of which play a role in long-term memory. It is often prescribed to relax cerebral blood vessels after a stroke. Carbetapentane is a cough suppressant that heightens the activity of opioid receptors, which are active in pain relief. The myriad actions of the drugs tested, Dirks notes, "suggests the incredible diversity of pathways that might be regulating neural stem cells."

According to Dirks, now that the preliminary screen for candidate therapies has been performed, his group will take the most promising and determine whether they can inhibit the proliferation and growth of human tumor cells engrafted into the brains of mice. "We've cured cancer in the dish many times over, but we need to show this in vivo," says Dirks, who hopes to have the results of the new research by the end of the year.

If those tests are successful, he believes he can move somewhat swiftly to human trials, especially since terminal brain cancer patients are often more willing to engage in new, unproved treatment options. "Because we know that all the conventional therapies eventually fail," Dirks explains, "many patients do go on investigational therapy."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe