Paleontologists Unearth Colossal Cretaceous Crocodile in Niger

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: Courtesy of MIKE HETTWER AND PAUL SERENO

Paleontologists working in Niger's T¿n¿r¿ Desert have unearthed the fossilized remains of a crocodile that might give even Steve Irwin pause. Indeed, according to a report published today in the journal Science, this bigger, badder cousin of modern crocs measured up to 40 feet long and weighed in at eight metric tons. Dubbed Sarcosuchus imperator, the Cretaceous beast may have preyed on dinosaurs.

Researchers first recovered remains of Sarcosuchus in the T¿n¿r¿ Desert in 1964. Its paleontological significance, however, remained largely unexplored. The newly discovered skulls and partial skeletons, described by University of Chicago paleontologist Paul C. Sereno and colleagues, add significantly to what is known about the 110-million-year-old monster. "This new material gives us a good look at hypergiant crocodiles," Sereno remarks. "There's been rampant speculation about what they looked like and where they fit in the croc family tree, but no one had enough of the skull and skeleton to really nail any of the true giant crocs down until now." (In the image at the right, a Sarcosuchus skull dwarfs that of a modern crocodile.) Features in Sarcosuchus's skull and jaw, the researchers report, link it to two fish-eating fossil crocodilians known as Pholidosaurus and Terminonaris.Sarcosuchus, however, turned up in river¿not marine¿deposits and has feeding anatomy indicative of a more generalized diet. Sarcosuchus's long, broad snout is especially interesting, featuring at its tip a large bulbous growth, or nasal bulla. "We're still wondering what it's for," Sereno remarks. "Crocodilians are among the most vocal reptiles, so I wouldn't doubt that it may have been involved in both sound and smell."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Though it may have been the largest, Sarcosuchus certainly wasn't the only croc around during the Cretaceous. The Niger site alone has yielded the remains of six crocodilian species, including one "not much more than an Oreo cookie" in size, Sereno notes. "That's the fascinating thing about crocodile evolution," he muses. "It seems like modern crocodiles have been trimmed at each end of their size range, with the little ones and the big ones disappearing."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe