Pandemic Leads Geoengineering Experiment to Move from U.S. to Sweden

The project aims to use a balloon to release particles into the atmosphere to tamp down warming

Sunrise over Earth

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Harvard University researchers announced yesterday that they are seeking to move their first stratospheric test of a balloon that could one day be used in experiments to shade the Earth from the heating effects of greenhouse gases to Sweden.

Frank Keutsch, the principal investigator of the program, said the test is being moved out of the United States in part because of the coronavirus pandemic. An alternative facility in the United States couldn’t be found to host the balloon launch scheduled for early summer.

The Swedish Space Corp.’s center in Kiruna, Sweden, offered the possibility of a land-based descent, so the balloon and its propeller-driven gondola could be reused, Keutsch explained. He added that working in Sweden would help increase international collaboration, “which is important to us.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The first test of the project, called the Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment, is meant to see how well the balloon will operate in the thinning atmosphere at a height of 12.4 miles with an equipment payload of 1,323 pounds.

If it works, then a following test would use the propellers to slowly scatter and mix a small amount of calcium carbonate, a common form of mineral dust, into the atmosphere. The idea is to use about 4 pounds of the dust to create a test “beaker,” or a cloud that’s about 0.62 mile long and 328 feet in diameter.

After that, the balloon could loiter for as long as 24 hours, using instruments to test how the particles interact with each other and if they can limit solar radiation, thus reducing the amount being reflecting back into the atmosphere to be trapped there by former emissions. The geoengineering program is meant to prevent heat from building up in the atmosphere.

Later tests would also analyze whether dispersing substances from the balloon could harm the protective ozone layer that keeps the more harmful rays of sunlight from reaching the Earth.

Keutsch, who is a professor of chemistry and chemical biology, stressed that the tests will have to be approved by an outside advisory committee established by the dean of Harvard’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.

David Keith, a Harvard physicist who first proposed the experiment, explained in a press release yesterday that new models showed that the aerosol would likely reduce ozone in the “beaker” by less than 3%.

Keith explained in a video released earlier this month that the point of the atmospheric test was to provide real data to make sure the models are correct. “The big question is how could we be wrong?” he added.

Such geoengineering processes might be needed on a large scale even if global leaders are able to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2060, Keith said.

Future generations, he noted, will have to deal with the effects of emissions from prior years that will linger in the atmosphere for decades or longer.

“The seas will still be rising, and people will still be dying from heat waves,” he said.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe