New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Panicky Hot Spots

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Millions of people—some 2 percent of the U.S. population—experience panic attacks, characterized by sudden fear accompanied by rapid heartbeat, nausea, shaking, numbness, hyperventilating or sweating. Many end up in emergency rooms, believing they are having a heart attack. What is more, one third of patients who visit a cardiologist with atypical chest pain actually suffer from unrecognized panic disorder.

Now scientists are trying to identify genetic markers that could help predict who is prone to the terrifying condition and provide a possible avenue for new drugs that could alleviate symptoms.

To reach this goal, researchers at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons are taking a two-pronged approach: tracking genes in panicky animals and hunting for similar genes in people with varying degrees of fear. Recent animal tests point to interesting hot spots on several chromosomes. Their locations have led Columbia epidemiologist Myrna Weissman and Nobel laureate Eric R. Kandel of the school's Center for Neurobiology and Behavior to look for genetic markers in human volunteers. Other investigators have linked two genes, COMT and Adora2A, to panic disorder in people. Dozens more genes could be involved. “There is definitely a strong genetic component,” Weissman says. Individuals with a close relative suffering from panic have a fivefold increase in risk.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Having genes in hand will help unravel the syndrome's biochemical causes and aid in diagnosis. Currently the average victim sees 10 physicians before getting a correct diagnosis.

SA Mind Vol 16 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Panicky Hot Spots” in SA Mind Vol. 16 No. 3 (), p. 6
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1005-6

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe