Paradoxical Materials Can Expand When Compressed

Paradoxical materials could grow when compressed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Call it the reverse psychology of stuff. Imagine a cushion that swells up instead of compressing when you sit on it. Or a rubber band that shrinks instead of elongating when you stretch it. If two physicists at Northwestern University are right, scientists may soon be able to make materials with such mind-boggling behavior.

The two researchers, Adilson Motter and Zachary Nicolaou, describe their proposal in work that appeared online in May in Nature Materials. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.) They show how the unusual response, called negative compressibility, could theoretically emerge from putting together the right building blocks into a “metamaterial”—a material whose behavior is dictated not by its chemical or molecular composition but by its patterning at larger scales.

The molecules of such a material would act like springs in a jack-in-the-box: when slightly compressed, they transition into an expanded state. And just as it takes effort to put jack-in-the-box springs back into the box, the materials would require energy to be restored to their original state. A negatively compressible material could be built by stacking up many such springlike molecules (or something equivalent to them) like Lego bricks. “Everything that's needed to build this material exists,” Motter says, although no one has done the actual engineering to build it.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


And what would the material be good for? The most promising applications might be in sensors and actuators, where the materials could amplify a force by expanding or contracting, or in safety gear such as seat belts, Motter notes. For now, though, he says, the idea is just a curiosity.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe