Parched Presence

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The barren, Mars-like heart of the Atacama Desert in northern Chile seemed to presage bad news for discovering life on the Red Planet. Researchers failed to find organisms in the soil, which gets rain maybe once a decade and may be as arid as places on Mars. Now Raina Maier of the University of Arizona and her colleagues have discovered that the soil is not sterile after all. They dug every 1,000 feet for a 120-mile stretch, cleaning their hand trowels with disinfectant before each scoop. Earlier researchers shoveled down to four inches; this time investigators went eight to 12 inches deep. In the November 19, 2004, Science, they report that, when moistened, samples from areas devoid of plant life for at least a million years yielded bacteria, which may have survived in a state of suspended animation. The NASA Phoenix mission will attempt a similar experiment on Mars in 2008.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 292 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Parched Presence” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 292 No. 2 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0205-32b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe