Parental Imprinting in Autism

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Autism affects people in so many different ways and to such varying degrees that it's hard to diagnose. It's harder still to discern its cause. Scientists have known that environmental and genetic factors come into play, but the complexity of both influences has made them virtually impenetrable. Now, however, researchers at Duke University's Center for Human Genetics have found a new way to look at how genes contribute to the disease. And that insight, which they present today at a meeting of the American Society for Human Genetics, might just simplify the task of unraveling autism's origins.

The clue, explains senior researcher Margaret Pericak-Vance, is that a phenomenon known as genomic imprinting may be at work in passing on autism. In short, imprinting is a process by which a gene's expression in a child depends on which parent donated it before development. Unlike Mendelian genetics, in which dominant and recessive genes control the results, imprinting is a kind of molecular battle of the sexes; by silencing the other parent's copy of a gene, a mother or father advances their own genetic interests. And although initially discovered in insects, genomic imprinting has recently been found in some rare human disorders, such as Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes¿both of which can produce symptoms like those in autism.

"Many children with these syndromes have altered genes in the same region of chromosome 15 that we are looking at in autism," Pericak-Vance said. So they were looking as well at a region on chromosome 7 implicated in autism, which also contained imprinting genes. To test their idea that imprinting was involved by way of these chromosomes, Pericak-Vance and colleagues examined 82 families who had at least two members affected by autism in some form. Their findings suggested a paternal effect on chromosome 7 and a maternal effect on chromosome 15. "Once we better understand the genetic factors involved in autism, genetic testing can theoretically be offered to families at risk," notes postdoctoral fellow Allison Ashley-Koch. "In addition, identification of such genes will pave the way for development of therapies to improve the quality of life for these children."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe