Patent Office Decision Respecting Designs Application Of Franklin Field for a Patent for a Design for Paper Collars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On appeal to the examihers-in-chief-s. ii. hodges for the board.It is true, as has been remarked in this case, that the differences between the design presented, and tlie one referred to by the Examiner in eharge , are very slight . The lines in the respective drawings are nearly the same, and w!Cre nearly in the same direction. it must be remembered, nevertheless, that almost imperceptible ariatioi s in the lines of drawings often change the whole aspect of tlimages represented, and mayeost intense study, and the exercise of the hightest geMus. The emotions indicated by the painting' of a face may be entirely changed by modifications which would not be notieed by a stranger to the art. The novelty of a design is not to be determined, there fore, by the e xtent to which the lines are parallel to those of another, f)ut the effect must also be taken into consideration. The design which was referred to as being an anticipation of the one before us was intended to represent aeoila< with a hem. The purpose of the applieant is to represent a collar with a taue attached to the bordert and his drawing is modifled acco

Scientific American Magazine Vol 21 Issue 17This article was published with the title “Patent Office Decision Respecting Designs Application Of Franklin Field for a Patent for a Design for Paper Collars” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 21 No. 17 (), p. 270
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican10231869-270

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe