Patent Pavements

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In another article we have presented the case of a railroad at law, caused by the incapacity or rapacity of our Common Council; we have also a few words to say respecting ? pavement at law. The Common Council of New York City made a contract with a firm named Russ & Reid, for paving one of the stireets with what is named the " Russ Pavement." The contract granted to Russ & Reid allowed them$6,50persquare yard, while another responsible person offered to do it for $3,50 per square yard. A perpetual injunction has therefore been moved for to restrain the execution of such a contract, and we hope it will be granted. What is called the " Russ Pavement," is no doubt a very excellent one, but no Mr. Russ ever invented it. and it is no youth. It has been contended that as Mr. Russ has a patent, the contract could not be given to any other person. It is true that a patent was granted in March 1848, to Mr. Russ, but not for a pavement (although we believe he applied tor that) but for making the under stratum of concrete below the pavement, in pannels. The patent was not obtained for the concrete understratum, for that was used before he was born, but for making it in panneh. No one, therefore,, can use his pannelled concrete, but all the rest of the pavement, viz., concrete understratum and granite surface blocks, are common property. It is our opinion that our streets can be paved for $3,-50 per square yard, with as good blocks, and in as substantial a manner as any that ever was laid down.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 42This article was published with the title “Patent Pavements” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 42 (), p. 333
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican07021853-333c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe