New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Patent Watch: Fluorescence Detection of Poison Oak Oil

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fluorescence detection of poison oak oil: Tens of millions of Americans suffer every year after close encounters with urushiol, the oily allergen in poison oak and poison ivy. The barest brush of urushiol-tainted foliage, clothing or fur against the skin is often all that is needed to set off a severe allergic reaction, and by the time itching sets in, it is too late to avoid a rash. After experiencing a particularly nasty run-in with poison oak, Rebecca Braslau of the University of California, Santa Cruz, decided to fight back—with science. “I was thinking, ‘I'm a chemist—I should be able to do something with this,’” she recalls. Patent no. 8,389,232 B2 details her invention, a substance that fluoresces in the presence of urushiol and gives an early warning to wash the allergen off. “It's a spray that you can put on clothing and tools,” Braslau says. “Then you can hold the sprayed areas up to a fluorescent light to see the oils—they glow blue.” She plans to test it on human skin soon. The invention, Braslau says, could help hikers, firefighters, rescue workers, farmers and anyone else who spends time outdoors.

About Arielle Duhaime-Ross

Arielle is a Scientific American editorial intern. She covers a variety of topics including health, technology and zoology.

More by Arielle Duhaime-Ross
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Patent Watch” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 2 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0813-24b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe