Patent Watch

Haptic computer interface

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It’s great that your smartphone allows you to dial a cell number or adjust the volume on your favorite song just by tapping the screen, but it’s something of a one-sided relationship. No matter where you tap, it feels the same; no tactile feedback whatsoever. Don’t you ever hanker for something more?

A proposed interface from Verizon would change the smartphone experience. The idea, described in patent No. 7,952,498, is to create a mechanical apparatus below the screen that could elevate discrete portions of the surface in the shape of any graphic displayed in the pixel grid. Need to call home? A keypad would sprout in the shape of phone buttons. Want to skip a track on that Beatles album? Pause and fast-forward controls would rise up. Not only would these elevated portions provide more sensory stimulation, they would make keys easier to distinguish from one another, cutting back on mistakes. “What you would feel is a subtle, raised area on the screen,” says George Higa, a user-interface designer at Verizon who was recently granted the patent. The patent does not specify what Verizon would use to elevate the buttons on the screen, but  “technology moves so quickly, it could be any number of things,” Higa says. 

Researchers have demonstrated the ability to provide tactile feedback with an array of pins, air jets and an electric current. “Haptic feedback,” or feedback that is based on the sense of touch, “is the future of computing interfaces,” says Allison M. Okamura, a professor of mechanical engineering at Johns Hopkins University.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But creating that feedback on a pocket-size gadget remains challenging. Researchers at Northwestern University have designed a device called the TPaD that can ultrasonically vibrate the screen, making delineated portions feel “slippery” and allowing programmers to modulate the friction on different parts of the screen, Okamura explains. But last she knew, the smallest of these devices was six inches high and a couple of inches thick.“While it would be terrific to have a device like the one [Verizon] describes, I just don’t know how it would fit into a phone,” Okamura says.

Adam Piore is a freelance journalist. His last article for Scientific American examined the movement to bring evolution back to the classroom.

More by Adam Piore
Scientific American Magazine Vol 305 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Patent Watch” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 305 No. 3 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican092011-3jQGMO82thCSAElBxZpQDb

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe