New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Patent Watch: Non-Distorting Mirror

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Wide angle substantially nondistorting mirror: Every passenger's side mirror carries a warning that objects “are closer than they appear” because the curved surface designed to give drivers a wider field of view ends up distorting distance. But U.S. regulations require the driver's side mirror to be flat because depth perception was judged to be more important than field of view at that location. The result is a blind spot just beyond the driver's left shoulder. While working on a way to give soccer-playing robots a 360-degree view, R. Andrew Hicks, a mathematician at Drexel University, figured out how a small mirror could reflect a wide view without distortion. That work inspired him to create a blind spot–free driver's side mirror.

After years of algorithm tweaking, Hicks came up with patent No. 8,180,606, which describes a driver's side mirror with a field of view of at least 45 degrees, as compared with current mirrors that reflect only 15 to 17 degrees.

Hicks's algorithm employs thousands of calculations to create a “weird wavy surface,” which bounces each ray of light toward the driver in just the right way, he says. The curves are subtle, however, and the mirror appears smooth. Manufacturers only recently developed the technology to shape this kind of free-form surface. Before companies roll out vehicles with the updated mirror, regulations will need to change, but the new accessory could debut as an aftermarket add-on in the next few years.

About Marissa Fessenden

Marissa is a freelance science journalist in Bozeman, Montana. She was an editorial intern with Scientific American from June 2012 through June 2013. Follow on Twitter @marisfessenden

More by Marissa Fessenden
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Patent Watch” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 4 (), p. 26
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1012-26b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe