New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Pay-as-You-Go Solar Gaining Steam in Africa

Cheap energy from sunlight could displace kerosene in African villages

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In rural sub-Saharan Africa, only one in six people has access to electricity. Kerosene lamps provide a primary light source in many households—at a cost to both health and wealth. A villager in Kenya or Rwanda pays dozens of times more for kerosene than an American spends on grid electricity for a comparable amount of lighting. Charging a mobile phone at a kiosk is even more expensive. “The poorest people in the world are not just paying a bit more for their energy; they're paying a disproportionate amount,” says Simon Bransfield-Garth, CEO of Azuri Technologies, a solar services firm based in Cambridge, England. Kerosene lamps also pollute the air, and the fuel poses a poisoning hazard, especially to children.

Solar kits for lighting and charging batteries are a promising alternative, but many rural families cannot afford the up-front cost of $50 or more. So Azuri and several other firms sell solar kits on a pay-as-you-go plan, which drives down the customer's initial investment to around $10. Families then pay for energy when they need it or when they can (say, after a successful harvest). After the solar kit is paid off, any subsequent electricity is free.

The idea is gaining steam. Azuri counts more than 21,000 solar customers. M-KOPA Solar, which builds on the widespread M-Pesa mobile payment network, serves 40,000 households. And U.S.-based Angaza Design is on track to reach 10,000 customers in the next year or so.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scaling the technology to even more households could prove challenging. Some start-ups are running into limits of capital as they await reimbursement from new customers. The cash-flow constraints only intensify when customers default.

Still, the rollout may offer important lessons for the rest of the world. “There are all these debates about when solar will reach grid parity in the U.S. and elsewhere,” says Bryan Silverthorn, chief technology officer for Angaza. “Africa is a place where, for a huge swath of the population, solar energy is now the cheapest option. No one knows what will happen next.”

David Wogan is an engineer and policy researcher who writes about energy, technology, and policy.

David's academic and professional background includes a unique blend of technology and policy in the field of energy systems. Most recently, David worked at Austin Energy, a Texas municipal utility, implementing a Department of Energy stimulus grant related to energy efficiency. Previously, David was a member of the Energy & Climate Change team at the White House Council on Environmental Quality for the Obama Administration.

David holds two Master's degrees from The University of Texas at Austin in Mechanical Engineering and Public Affairs. While at UT, David was a researcher in the Webber Energy Group, where his research focused on advanced biofuel production to offset petroleum use in the transportation sector. David holds a Bachelor's of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, where he researched nuclear non-proliferation measurement technology.

David is a 2013 Aspen Institute Journalism Scholar, joining a select group of journalists from Slate, ABC News, and The New York Times.

David lives in Austin, Texas. Follow along on Twitter or email him at david.wogan@me.com.

More by David Wogan
Scientific American Magazine Vol 310 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Solar on Demand” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 310 No. 2 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0214-24a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe