New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Data Points: People in Pain

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The U.S. hurts, according to a survey of 3,982 Americans. In an attempt to understand daily aches, Alan B. Krueger of Princeton University and Arthur A. Stone of Stony Brook University asked respondents to rate their pain on a scale of 0 (none) to 6 (very strong) at three random intervals during the waking hours of every day. The study reveals that a “pain gap” exists: poorer, less educated people tend to suffer more than wealthier, more educated individuals. Not surprisingly, pain affects life satisfaction.

Percent of Americans in pain at any given time: 28

PERCENT OF THOSE IN PAIN WHO:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Earn less than $30,000: 34.2

Earn more than $100,000: 22.9

Did not finish high school: 33

Got a college degree: 20.2

Are not satisfied with life: 53.9

Average pain rating: 2.26

Are very satisfied with life: 22.4

Average pain rating: 0.66

AMOUNT SPENT ANNUALLY ON:

Nonprescription painkillers: $2.6 billion

Outpatient prescription painkillers: $13.8 billion

Productivity lost annually because of pain: $60 billion

SOURCE: Lancet, May 3, 2008

Scientific American Magazine Vol 299 Issue 1This article was published with the title “People in Pain” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 299 No. 1 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0708-32a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe