Data Points: People in Pain

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The U.S. hurts, according to a survey of 3,982 Americans. In an attempt to understand daily aches, Alan B. Krueger of Princeton University and Arthur A. Stone of Stony Brook University asked respondents to rate their pain on a scale of 0 (none) to 6 (very strong) at three random intervals during the waking hours of every day. The study reveals that a “pain gap” exists: poorer, less educated people tend to suffer more than wealthier, more educated individuals. Not surprisingly, pain affects life satisfaction.

Percent of Americans in pain at any given time: 28

PERCENT OF THOSE IN PAIN WHO:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Earn less than $30,000: 34.2

Earn more than $100,000: 22.9

Did not finish high school: 33

Got a college degree: 20.2

Are not satisfied with life: 53.9

Average pain rating: 2.26

Are very satisfied with life: 22.4

Average pain rating: 0.66

AMOUNT SPENT ANNUALLY ON:

Nonprescription painkillers: $2.6 billion

Outpatient prescription painkillers: $13.8 billion

Productivity lost annually because of pain: $60 billion

SOURCE: Lancet, May 3, 2008

Scientific American Magazine Vol 299 Issue 1This article was published with the title “People in Pain” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 299 No. 1 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0708-32a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe