People May Pick Friends Who Smell Like Them

Similar body odors might determine if two strangers will “click.”

Woman with arm around friend driving car

Have you ever met someone and known right away you’d found a new friend? Was it their smile, their laugh, a twinkle in their eye or maybe a clever joke they told? In truth, the clincher might have been an underappreciated item on your subconscious checklist. As is the case for many mammals, your instant bond may have developed right after the first sniff.

Whether we notice it or not, we are constantly probing our surroundings with an olfactory radar just like rodents and nonhuman primates. Mice and chimps seem to have the scent smarts to know immediately who to befriend and who to rebuff. And though we might think of ourselves as apart from our warm-blooded relatives, new research shows that us hairless hominins may not be so different after all.

Yes, we gravitate toward a smile or people we have something in common with, such as age, personality, and even physical appearance, but it seems we might also secretly seek out those who smell like us. Inbal Ravreby, a neuroscientist at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, got her inspiration for an experiment to test out this idea after she started to contemplate the phrase “There is chemistry between us.” Sure, Ravreby reasoned, it could just be another figure of speech. “Some phrases are just phrases,” she says, “but sometimes we have phrases because people notice a phenomenon. It’s worth checking.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ravreby and her research team did just that by employing a chemical sensing device called an electronic nose, along with a collection of human “smellers” to back up its measurements. Their work—published in Science Advances on Friday—found that friends who “clicked” when they first met smelled more alike than random pairs of people, suggesting our nose might play a part in how we know who we’ll get along with best.

For the experiment, the researchers gathered 20 pairs of same-sex friends who reported clicking during their first encounter with each other. For three days, participants gave up scented soaps, garlic and anything else that might alter their body odor, and each wore a cotton T-shirt to bed to capture their scent.

The stinky shirts were handed over to the electronic nose, which used an array of sensors to measure the chemical difference in the body odors of the members of each pair. The researchers found that twosomes who clicked with each other when they met had more similar scents, compared with randomly selected pairs of other people in the study.

To compare the electronic nose to what humans actually detect, a team of designated smellers also tested scent similarity. When sniffing body odor samples, the human smellers ranked each scent in “intensity,” “pleasantness” and another three categories. Overall, the pairs of fast friends had more similar smell rankings than the coupled strangers. The human smell squad also reported that “click friends”—when sniffed side by side—had more similar body odors than strangers, showing that the closeness in these smells was present in how people perceived them, not just the chemistry detected by the electronic nose.

Scent similarity was even able to successfully predict which pairs of complete strangers would get along 71 percent of the time. After also embedding their odor into T-shirts for aroma analysis, the pairs of strangers were placed half a meter apart to play a game where they tried to mimic each other’s movements and then asked how they felt about their partner. Players who reported clicking with their game partners had more similar body odor chemistry, additional evidence that such odor plays a role in how humans identify prospective pals.

“I'm really excited that we have a new piece of insight into how body odors are implicated in social interaction and also in friendships,” says aroma chemist Helene Loos of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg and the Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging, both in Germany. Loos, who was not involved in the study, is excited for future research, which she hopes will build on the work of Ravreby and her colleagues by identifying the specific chemical compounds that might have a role in sparking human friendships.

Moving forward, Ravreby wants to delve deeper into the mechanisms behind our subconscious social sniffing. She plans to measure how brain activity responds when a person smells a body odor that reminds them of themselves versus an aroma that’s very different. Her theory is that humans constantly sniff themselves to establish a baseline scent to compare with the odors of everyone around them and that this might play a role in how we subconsciously tell friend from foe.

“I think it’s a reminder for us humans to appreciate how much we’re similar to other mammals,” Ravreby says. “[Taking] inspiration from other animals and the amazing mechanisms that they have can really help us understand what [causes] social bonding and what doesn’t.”

Sasha Warren is a freelance journalist. They were a 2022 AAAS Mass Media Fellow at Scientific American and hold a Ph.D. in planetary science.

More by Sasha Warren
SA Mind Vol 33 Issue 5This article was published with the title “People May Pick Friends Who Smell Like Them” in SA Mind Vol. 33 No. 5 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0922-08

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe