People Mostly to Blame for Recent Glacier Melt

Scientists attribute two-thirds of the meltdown of glaciers to human causes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Human activity was responsible for two-thirds of glacial melt, which increased sea levels by 69 millimeters across the world in the past two decades, according to a new study published in Science yesterday.

The rest of the observed glacial melt was due to natural causes.

This is the first time scientists have attributed a certain portion of the glacial melt and the resulting sea-level rise to humans. As such, the study is a landmark as well as a preliminary effort; the scientists are just 85 percent confident of their values.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"They have done an interesting analysis that confirms a big part of our intuition that anthropogenic forcing is important in guiding the glacier response to climate change," said Shad O'Neel, a glaciologist at the U.S. Geological Survey in Alaska who was not affiliated with the study.

Retreating glaciers are a powerful visual of climate change and a key contributor to global sea-level rise together. Over the past decade, glaciers have contributed as much to the oceans as the ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland. Over the past century, melting glaciers have accounted for half of the global sea-level rise and will continue to play a role, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

But the reason behind glacier melt has been difficult to resolve.

"It seems so obvious that it is getting warm because of anthropogenic emissions and if it's getting warmer, glaciers are melting," Ben Marzeion, a climate scientist at the University of Innsbruck in Austria and lead author of the study, said over the phone. "The problem with that is, nobody had shown robustly that these glaciers are melting because of anthropogenic emissions."

Worldwide inventory of glaciers
This is because glaciers respond to changes in climate over many decades or even centuries. Some of the melt observed today could be an artifact of events that played out in the distant past.

Even more confusingly, individual glaciers can melt at different rates depending on the topography, elevation and local climate. There is no one equation that could explain the behavior of all the glaciers of the world. Scientists have so far studied in detail only about 350 glaciers out of the 200,000 that exist today.

A major step toward resolving some of the unknowns came last year when scientists released the Randolph Glacier Inventory of all the glaciers in the world.

The inventory was a huge step forward and was used by the IPCC in its latest report released last year, Tobias Bolch, a senior glaciologist at the University of Zurich who helped assemble the inventory, said over the phone.

But the inventory also has its uncertainties, especially in regions like China and India, Bolch said. Glaciers tend to cross over political boundaries and give rise to contested water supplies, which means nations do not readily share information about their glaciers.

Marzeion and his colleagues used the inventory to create a model of how glaciers behave. They then input the results of the glacier model into 12 different climate models. This allowed the scientists to explore the impacts of climate change on glacial evolution.

They found that from 1851 to 2010, glaciers contributed 99 millimeters of global sea-level rise without anthropogenic influence. And with the influence, glaciers contributed 133 millimeters.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe