Perfect yet Imperfect

An exceptional musical skill yields clues to auditory processing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If someone plunks a random piano key, a tiny minority of people can identify the note based on its sound alone. These people boast perfect pitch, the ability to recognize individual sound frequencies without any external reference. But even these gifted few are not truly perfect. A new study shows that their errors, though subtle, provide a previously unseen glimpse into how biological and environmental factors together shape hearing.

Absolute pitch, commonly known as perfect pitch, results from the confluence of early musical training and a rare genetic endowment. Yet the neurology underlying absolute pitch (and its converse, congenital tune-deafness, or amusia) remains obscure. In the new study, researchers identified about 1,000 people who could instantly and effortlessly label each of a series of randomly presented acoustical tones. Results revealed that people with absolute pitch formed a distinct clump of scores, far outside the normal range of ability. “There are people who have this exquisitely perfect pitch-naming ability, and the rest of us are just guessing,” says the study’s lead author, geneticist Jane Gitschier of the University of California, San Francisco. That fact, combined with previous family heritability studies, suggests that, unlike most complex traits, perfect pitch may be governed by only one gene or at most very few.

The study also exposed an Achilles’ heel for people with absolute pitch: the notes surrounding A. Volunteers with perfect pitch were far more likely to mistake a G-sharp for an A than to make any other error. They also perceived A-sharp frequently as A. The researchers suggest that this pattern may reflect the use of the note A as a universal tuning frequency in bands and orchestras. As a result of this disproportionate exposure, the group hypothesizes, the note may act as a “perceptual magnet,” fooling the mind into lumping nearby tones into the A category.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In its ongoing research, Gitschier’s group is trying to isolate a gene that governs absolute pitch, with the goal of then probing its molecular machinery. Ultimately, Gitschier says, she hopes to use absolute pitch as a platform for better understanding how the brain changes as a result of experience—a phenomenon known as neuroplasticity. The new findings, according to Dennis Drayna, a geneticist at the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders who studies pitch perception, “open the door to a powerful and precise measure of learning and neuroplasticity within the auditory system. You can look at this only in people who have absolute pitch because those are the only people for whom this learning effect is going to be stable and measurable.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe