Pet Prairie Dogs Suspected in U.S. Monkeypox Outbreak

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cases of monkeypox have been identified for the first time in North America, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports. The disease, which is similar to smallpox but less infectious and less deadly, had previously been found primarily in West and Central Africa. So far, the CDC is investigating 33 potential cases from three states--Wisconsin, Illinois and Indiana--and as of Monday afternoon, four cases had been confirmed through laboratory testing.

Researchers have tracked the outbreak to prairie dogs that were sold as pets from stores in the Milwaukee area and at a pet swap meet in northern Wisconsin. A Milwaukee animal distributor bought the infected animals, together with a sick Gambian giant rat, from a distributor in northern Illinois. According to the CDC, all of the people suspected of having monkeypox reported close contact with prairie dogs, either in a pet shop, a veterinary setting or in a household that had one of the animals as a pet.

Efforts are under way to trace other prairie dogs and rats that may be carrying the virus. "We're trying to track down these animals to eliminate the possibility that we will set up a persistent reservoir of the disease [in North America]," notes Stephen Ostroff of the CDC's National Center for Infectious Diseases. Investigators are particularly concerned that the prairie dogs could transmit the virus to other wild animals, including rodents and rabbits, that could entrench it further in the U.S. "At this point, we don't know how many animals or humans may be involved," Ostroff says. "And we don't know the extent and scope of the problem in terms of the number of affected areas."

The primary route of transmission is thought to be close contact between an infected prairie dog and humans. (Gambian giant rats are imported from Africa as exotic pets and may have transmitted the virus to prairie dogs, which are found throughout North America.) In some cases, a bite from an infected animal led to the development of illness. In others, handling of an animal with skin lesions was enough to transmit the virus. The CDC notes that the possibility of human-to-human transmission cannot be ruled out at this time, but this is thought to be unlikely. "We have to be a little cautious because we don¿t necessarily have all the information that we need at this point about how exactly the virus may be transmitted," Ostroff comments. "But it certainly looks to us like direct contact with one of these ill animals appears to be required."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe