Photographic Scouting at Night

An Artist's Contribution to an Aeronautic Problem

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


WHILE the matter of using aeroplanes as actual fighting units in warfare is still in dispute, there is no question that they will play a most important part as scouts. In fact, they have actually been used in this capacity by the Italian army in Tripoli. In the very earliest days of aeronautics, this use of the aeroplane was suggested, and pictures were published showing an army .scout m a k i n g sketches from an aeroplane. A later idea has been to use a camera so as to facilitate the work of the scout. It has occur r e d to the artist whose drawing is reproduced herewith, that photography under such circumstances would be rather .difficult, owing to the fact that the machine would have to be b r oug h t within comparatively small elevation above the fortifications that were to be photo-gt a p h ed, and would thus be an easy target for the gunners below. He believes that night photography w o u I d be better; for then the aeroplane could steal into position over the fortifications, and flash its light upon them for a few brief moments . while pictures were taken. The best camera for the purpose w o u 1 d be one adapted to take a kinematographic series of pictures. Out of the set of pic t u res thus taken, there would, he argues, surely be a few which would show the fortifications to good advantage as the .aeroplane passed over them. The brief interval during which the searchlight of the aeroplane would play upon the fortifications might not be sufficient to enable the gun- M ners to take accurate aim upon the aircraft. In order to increase the value of the photographs, it would be well to determine the height of the machine above the fortifications and hence the scale of the pictures. The height above sea level could readily be determined by means of a barometer, but it would not necessarily show the height above the fortifications. However, with a searchlight throwing a conical beam of fixed angle, the spot of light upon a film taken with a camera of known focus, would give an approximate index, from which the height of the machine above the fortifications would be determined. By this means it would be possible to make an accurate survey of the fortifications with a minimum exposure of the aeronauts. Another method of discovering the height of the aeroplane above the fortifications, the artist suggests, is to have two searchlights placed at opposite ends of the machine and mounted to move together in such a way [that their beams would intersect always at a fixed distance below the aeroplane. The height of the aeroplane above the fortifications would then be shown by the size of the intensely illuminated spot produced by the overlapping portions of the beams of light.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 105 Issue 19This article was published with the title “Photographic Scouting at Night” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 105 No. 19 (), p. 404
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican11041911-404

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe