New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Photos Reveal Location of Lost Comet Lander Philae

Pinpointing lander’s cold resting place on comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko will be a boon to researchers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The last resting place of the European Space Agency’s (ESA’s) comet lander Philae has been confirmed, less than a month before the end of the mission that saw it travel billions of kilometres from Earth.

Photographs taken by Philae’s mother ship Rosetta on 2 September clearly show the lander, including two of its three legs. The pictures, released on 5 September, confirm that Philae lies on its side in the shadow of a cliff, lodged in a crack, with one of its legs in the air.

Pinpointing Philae’s whereabouts and orientation should now help scientists to interpret the data that the lander beamed back to Earth during its short life, in particular, in refining data from CONSERT, a radio instrument designed to study the comet’s interior.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“This wonderful news means that we now have the missing ‘ground-truth’ information needed to put Philae’s three days of science into proper context, now that we know where that ground actually is,” Matt Taylor, ESA’s Rosetta project scientist, wrote on the agency’s blog.

In the shade

Philae’s resting place had a huge impact on its mission. The lander’s tilted position meant that the comet’s surface partially blocked Philae’s antenna, making communication difficult, and the shady spot meant that the craft could not charge its solar panels, so Philae went into hibernation after just three days on the comet’s surface. After that, the lander made only sporadic but fruitless contact with Rosetta, and in July, ESA switched off Rosetta’s radio communications with the lander for good.

The latest images— which have a resolution of 5 centimetres per pixel— come from a sweep of 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko made by Rosetta from its closest-ever distance from the surface, just 2.7 kilometres. They confirm a suspected sighting of Philae that was made in 2015 by combining images with data from Philae’s radio instrument.

Rosetta will now pass closer and closer to the surface as it prepares for a final manoeuvre that will send it crashing into the comet on September 30.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on August 31, 2016.

Elizabeth Gibney is a senior physics reporter for Nature magazine.

More by Elizabeth Gibney

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe