Photos Reveal Location of Lost Comet Lander Philae

Pinpointing lander’s cold resting place on comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko will be a boon to researchers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The last resting place of the European Space Agency’s (ESA’s) comet lander Philae has been confirmed, less than a month before the end of the mission that saw it travel billions of kilometres from Earth.

Photographs taken by Philae’s mother ship Rosetta on 2 September clearly show the lander, including two of its three legs. The pictures, released on 5 September, confirm that Philae lies on its side in the shadow of a cliff, lodged in a crack, with one of its legs in the air.

Pinpointing Philae’s whereabouts and orientation should now help scientists to interpret the data that the lander beamed back to Earth during its short life, in particular, in refining data from CONSERT, a radio instrument designed to study the comet’s interior.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“This wonderful news means that we now have the missing ‘ground-truth’ information needed to put Philae’s three days of science into proper context, now that we know where that ground actually is,” Matt Taylor, ESA’s Rosetta project scientist, wrote on the agency’s blog.

In the shade

Philae’s resting place had a huge impact on its mission. The lander’s tilted position meant that the comet’s surface partially blocked Philae’s antenna, making communication difficult, and the shady spot meant that the craft could not charge its solar panels, so Philae went into hibernation after just three days on the comet’s surface. After that, the lander made only sporadic but fruitless contact with Rosetta, and in July, ESA switched off Rosetta’s radio communications with the lander for good.

The latest images— which have a resolution of 5 centimetres per pixel— come from a sweep of 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko made by Rosetta from its closest-ever distance from the surface, just 2.7 kilometres. They confirm a suspected sighting of Philae that was made in 2015 by combining images with data from Philae’s radio instrument.

Rosetta will now pass closer and closer to the surface as it prepares for a final manoeuvre that will send it crashing into the comet on September 30.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on August 31, 2016.

Elizabeth Gibney is a senior physics reporter for Nature magazine.

More by Elizabeth Gibney

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe