Physicists Find Strong Evidence for New State of Superconductivity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers have found the clearest evidence yet for a superconducting state that differs from its mirror image. Lead scientist Ying Liu of Penn State University says the results, which come after six years of effort, are ¿definitive proof¿ that strontium ruthenate, or SRO, exhibits ¿odd-parity¿ superconductivity, sometimes called spin-triplet superconductivity. But not everyone is convinced yet. The results are published in the current issue of Science.

Superconductivity occurs when electrons throughout a material form pairs, which then merge into a single quantum-mechanical state that carries electrical current with no resistance. In different materials, the pairs have different properties. In most superconductors, the electron pairs have ¿even parity,¿ meaning that they look the same in a mirror. In SRO, in contrast, experiments suggest that the pairs form with odd parity at temperatures below one degree Celsius above absolute zero--that is, when the material becomes superconducting. A related state occurs in superfluid 3He, and experts have theorized on the basis of indirect evidence that a handful of other superconductors exhibit this state as well.

To make a direct measurement, Liu and his colleagues first had to figure out how to make a junction to an ordinary superconductor that could inject electron pairs into the SRO. They then made two of these junctions on opposite sides of a tiny polished crystal of SRO, forming a Superconducting Quantum Interference Device, or SQUID (see image). The superconducting current that can flow through the two junctions in parallel depends on whether they are in phase. For an odd-parity superconductor, the pairs should have opposite phases, and destructive interference between them should reduce the total current. However, magnetic fields less than 1 percent of the earth's field can completely scramble the phase, so the researchers had to carefully exclude all stray fields. They also had to correct for the field arising from the measurement current itself.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because of these corrections, says Dale Van Harlingen of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the Penn State work is ¿very suggestive, but not definitive.¿ Van Harlingen's group pioneered the interference technique on high-temperature superconductors, and has also been trying to extend it to SRO.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe