Physicists Fine-Tune Predicted Solar Neutrino Production Rate

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: ARND JUNGHANS

Chargeless, nearly massless and rarely seen interacting with matter, the subatomic particles known as neutrinos have proved exasperatingly difficult to study. For more than three decades, efforts to count the elusive particles yielded less than half the number the sun was thought to manufacture. Physicists finally solved that so-called solar neutrino problem last year, revealing that during their journey from the sun to Earth, some of the neutrinos change from one "flavor" to another. The sum total of the varietals, it turns out, amounts to approximately the predicted number. With that conundrum behind them, researchers turned their attention to sharpening some of their calculations. Findings reported in the current edition of the journal Physical Review Letters represent progress on that front.

Scientists have estimated the rate at which the sun manufactures neutrinos based on the sun's temperature; the amounts of beryllium, hydrogen, helium and other elements used for fuel; and the rates at which these materials combine with one another. The most uncertain of these measured reaction rates, Kurt Snover of the University of Washington and colleagues note, is that describing fusion between beryllium-7 and hydrogen. To reduce that uncertainty¿and hence fine-tune the predicted rate of solar neutrino production¿the team conducted an experiment. Using a particle accelerator, they bombarded a piece of beryllium-7 with protons (the nuclei of hydrogen atoms). This resulted in the transformation of the beryllium into boron-8, and neutrino emission quickly followed. (The experimental setup is pictured at the right.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Based on the new results, the team concludes that the fusion rate producing the solar neutrinos is 17 percent greater than previously thought. "It helps us understand better the differences in mass, as well as other properties, among these character-changing neutrinos," Snover says of the finding. "It's factors like these that go into the soup pot when you're trying to figure out what are the properties of a neutrino."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe