Pictures of Nerve Cells Hint at Changes Underlying Memory Formation

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists have captured the first images of brain cells making long-term connections in response to the kind of stimulation thought to underlie memory formation. "Long-lasting, durable memories that arise upon repeated stimulation [were] postulated to involve a visible change in these connections," Yukiko Goda of the University of California in San Diego explains, "but it had been quite controversial." The report describing these results appears in the current issue of Cell.

The leading model for how neurons connect to make memories assumes that a cell has to be prodded repeatedly to form a lasting connection, or synapse, with another cell. In an analogous way, Goda says, a student may remember something for a short time by cramming the night before a test, but only reviewing the material will make it stick.

To catch the process of synapse formation in action, Goda and colleagues engineered nerve cells to produce a fluorescent form of the actin protein, which provides a cell with structural support. The team grew these cells in culture on top of a silicon wafer. Shining light from a microscope onto a single cell caused electricity to flow through the illuminated silicon and excited the cell¿much like one neuron stimulates another. After a single exposure to the spotlight, actin crept toward spots that touched adjacent neurons, but soon receded. When the cells received four exposures over an hour, however, the actin moved into these junctions and stayed for up to 18 hours, suggesting that synapses had formed. "What we see shows all the hallmarks of a synapse," she notes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The next step, Goda says, will be to follow the nerve cells longer to see if the connections last. "But the exciting part is that now we can induce these sorts of changes and ask, 'What is the molecular machinery that underlies this [process]?'" When that's done, she adds, researchers can disrupt the mechanism in animals and see what happens.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe